Legal Q&A · Company & shareholders

The tax office has disqualified me as a managing director. What does this mean for my companies?

Law as at 3 October 2026

Short answer

A final disqualification decision means that for 3 years you may not serve as a managing director or any other member of a statutory or supervisory body, or as a procurator, in any company or cooperative. The prohibition is not limited to the company that underwent the tax audit. Your appointments end on the date the decision becomes final, and the companies must appoint a new managing director. You retain your shareholding. You can appeal against the decision and subsequently bring an administrative action.

The tax office has served you with a disqualification decision under the Tax Procedure Code. Once it becomes final, you cease to be a managing director not only in the company affected by the tax audit, but in all companies and cooperatives, for 3 years. Until the decision becomes final, you can challenge it and the companies can prepare to appoint a new managing director.

When the tax authority disqualifies a managing director

The grounds are set out in Section 157a(1) of Act No. 563/2009 Z. z. on Tax Administration. Both relate to an audit of an excess VAT deduction that ended with the loss of entitlement to a refund. That entitlement is lost if the VAT payer does not allow the audit to be carried out within 3 months of its commencement, as provided in Act No. 222/2004 Z. z. on Value Added Tax.

  • If the company’s audit ended in this way and the company also has tax arrears and arrears of other monetary payments that have been outstanding for more than 1 year and total at least EUR 5 000, its current managing director is disqualified.
  • If an audit of the entitlement claimed in a particular VAT return ended in this way, the person who was the managing director when that return was filed is disqualified. This may include a former managing director.

Disqualification does not apply if the company is subject to tax enforcement proceedings for arrears that continue to be paid more than a year after their due date, if the tax authority has permitted a payment deferral or payment by instalments, or if bankruptcy or restructuring proceedings have been commenced against it (Section 157a(7)). You should also consult a tax adviser about the procedure during the audit itself.

What disqualification means for all your companies

This is a disqualification decision under the Commercial Code (Act No. 513/1991 Zb.), with the following effect:

The following quotation is reproduced in its original language:

Právoplatnosťou rozhodnutia o vylúčení prestáva byť vylúčený zástupca členom štatutárneho orgánu, členom dozorného orgánu, vedúcim organizačnej zložky podniku, vedúcim podniku zahraničnej osoby, vedúcim organizačnej zložky podniku zahraničnej osoby alebo prokuristom vo všetkých obchodných spoločnostiach a družstvách.

§ 13a ods. 3 Obchodného zákonníka

Your appointments end as soon as the decision becomes final, rather than upon your removal from the Commercial Register. Disqualification lasts 3 years from the date the decision becomes final (Section 157a(3) of Act No. 563/2009 Z. z.). You must notify the affected companies of your disqualification without undue delay (Section 13a(4) of the Commercial Code). Anyone who continues to act on behalf of a company is liable as guarantor to its creditors for claims that the company fails to satisfy (Section 13a(5)). The decision is recorded in the Disqualification Register maintained by the Žilina District Court (Section 114(1) and (5) of Act No. 29/2026 Z. z. on the Commercial Register). The registry court will remove you even without an application (Section 92) and checks the register before registering a managing director or procurator (Section 51(3)). Section 13a does not address a shareholder’s membership in the company. You therefore retain your shareholding.

What your companies must do

Each company in which you served as managing director must appoint a new one within 3 months (Section 66(1) of the Commercial Code). In a single-member s. r. o., you appoint the new managing director by a decision in the form of a notarial deed or a document authorised by an attorney (Section 132(1)). In a company with multiple shareholders, a notary must certify the proceedings of the general meeting that decides on the new managing director (Section 127a(4)(c)).

If you were the sole managing director and a new managing director is not registered within 60 days after the expiry of the 3-month period for appointing one, the person who last held the office must apply for the company’s dissolution within 30 days (Section 66(3)).

How to challenge the decision

You can appeal against a disqualification decision within 30 days of service. An appeal filed in time has suspensive effect (Section 72(3) and (7) of Act No. 563/2009 Z. z.), so disqualification takes effect only when the decision becomes final. A disqualified person cannot request review outside the appeal procedure or apply to reopen the proceedings (Section 157a(4)).

You can bring an administrative action against the appellate authority’s decision within 2 months of its notification (Section 181(1) of Act No. 162/2015 Z. z.). The action itself does not suspend disqualification. However, the court may grant it suspensive effect on application (Section 185). The tax authority sends a duplicate of the decision together with a disqualification certificate to the court after 90 days have elapsed from the date the decision became final; if an action has been brought, it does so only after suspensive effect has been refused or the action dismissed (Section 157a(5) of Act No. 563/2009 Z. z.). Under the same provision, you must inform the tax authority immediately that you have brought the action.

In its judgment in case No. 3Sfk/30/2025 of 25. 3. 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court stated that, when imposing disqualification, the tax authority must also assess the managing director’s degree of fault and actual influence over the breach on an individual basis. It dismissed the cassation appeal and added that the managing director had not put forward any such circumstances. You should therefore describe and substantiate the specific circumstances of your case at the appeal stage.

Court-imposed disqualification for a late bankruptcy filing is discussed in the question on a managing director’s liability for company debts. We will review the decision and the audit documents with you and assess the arguments available to challenge it. We will prepare the appointment of a new managing director and your removal from the register in all affected companies as part of our Commercial Register changes service.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 3 October 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. My fellow shareholder and I agreed to divide profits in a different ratio from our ownership interests. Is that agreement valid? An agreement between shareholders is valid (in Slovakia it must be in writing), but it binds only those who entered into it. The company distributes profits in accordance with its articles of association. If these do not specify a different ratio, profits are distributed in proportion to paid-up capital contributions in Slovakia and ownership interests in Czechia. A general meeting resolution that does not comply with the agreement is therefore generally not invalid, and the affected shareholder retains a claim against the party who breached the agreement. If the different ratio is also to bind the company, it must be included in the articles of association.
  2. A former managing director withdrew money from the company's account and cannot document what it was used for. Must they repay it? If the company proves that the managing director withdrew money from its account and thereby reduced its assets, the former managing director must prove what the money was used for and that they handled it with professional care and in the company's interests. This is what the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic held in 2023. If the former managing director fails to prove this, they are liable to the company for the loss. The claim is pursued by the company or, under certain conditions, by a member, creditor or bankruptcy trustee. It must be pursued before it becomes time-barred.
  3. We are changing our registered office and business activities. Will we need a notary or lawyer to amend the articles of association after 17. 8. 2026? If the change of registered office and business activities is approved by the general meeting or the sole shareholder, the law does not require a notary or lawyer. Written minutes recording a resolution passed by the required majority are sufficient; in a single-member s. r. o., a written decision signed by the sole shareholder is sufficient. A notary is required if the same general meeting also decides on a managing director, a different allocation of voting rights, or a change in share capital that alters the relative proportions of the ownership interests. The sole shareholder may also record such a decision in a document authorised by a lawyer. An officially certified signature may be required on the consent of the owner of the property where the registered office will be located.
  4. I have resigned as managing director but am still listed in the Commercial Register. How can I have my entry removed? The company must apply to remove your entry. In Slovakia, it must do so within 30 days after your resignation takes effect. If it fails to do so, you may submit a qualified request to the registry court to bring the register into line with the actual position, supported by your resignation document. In Czechia, you may apply for removal yourself after 15 days have elapsed if you demonstrate a legal interest. First, however, check whether your resignation has already taken effect.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer