Legal Q&A · Commercial Contracts

Must an agreement be in writing to be valid?

Law as at 10 September 2026

Short answer

Most agreements are valid orally: Slovak law generally allows freedom of form. However, writing may be required by law, for example for property transfers, or by the parties themselves. If the prescribed written form is missing, the agreement is invalid. Amendments require a distinction between civil and commercial law: in a commercial relationship, merely signing the agreement in writing does not mean that every amendment must also be in writing. In practice, writing is recommended even where the law does not require it, for evidence and certainty.

Is an oral agreement valid?

Slovak private law starts from the principle that a legal act needs no special form to be valid. An agreement can be made orally, through conduct or even by a handshake. Invalidity for lack of form arises only if the act was not made in the form required by law or agreed by the parties (Section 40(1) of the Civil Code). In other words, if neither legislation nor agreement requires writing, an oral agreement is fully valid and binding.

When does the law require writing?

For some agreements, writing is a condition of validity. This typically applies to property transfers and other agreements where law or the parties require it (Section 46(1)). In a property transfer, both parties’ expressions of intent must also appear in the same document (Section 46(2)). The law also requires writing for contractual penalties and agreements to enter into a future agreement, for example. Written form is preserved where an act is performed electronically using means that record its contents and identify the person acting (Section 40(4)).

Can a written agreement be amended orally?

Under civil law, an agreement concluded in writing may only be amended or cancelled in writing (Section 40(2) of the Civil Code). Commercial agreements are subject to the specific rule in Section 272(2) of the Commercial Code: where a written agreement states that it may be amended or cancelled only in writing, that form must be observed. Merely concluding the original commercial agreement in writing does not automatically prohibit an oral amendment. Any specific statutory form requirements applicable to the particular legal act remain decisive.

Why put it in writing even when you do not have to?

We recommend writing even where it is not legally required. A written agreement proves what was agreed and protects against one person’s word being set against another’s. We draft and review documents tailored to your transaction: bespoke commercial agreements, works contracts and reviews of existing agreements before signing.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 10 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. What is an agreement to enter into a future agreement, and how binding is it? The parties undertake in writing to enter into a specified future agreement by an agreed date and must agree its essential terms. If one party does not conclude it, the other may, within one year, ask the court to substitute that party's expression of intent, and may also seek damages. The obligation ends if circumstances change substantially.
  2. Can the franchisor change the operating manual unilaterally? Generally yes, and appropriately so: the manual is a living document that maintains network standards. The right is not unlimited, however. Changes are restricted to what the parties agreed, and a change to the substance of the obligation or the agreed price cannot be imposed by referring to the manual. The key questions are whether the agreement allows time for implementation and who bears the resulting investment costs.
  3. Which law governs a franchise agreement between a Czech and a Slovak company? If the parties do not choose the law, the franchise agreement is governed by the law of the franchisee's habitual residence: the party taking and operating the franchise, rather than the brand owner's country. This follows from the Rome I Regulation's specific franchise rule. We therefore recommend an express choice of law; otherwise, a Slovak franchisor may discover that its Czech network operates under Czech law.
  4. When is an agreement invalid? An agreement may be invalid for several reasons: it was not made freely, seriously, certainly and comprehensibly; a party lacked capacity; or its content or purpose conflicts with or circumvents the law or is contrary to good morals. Absolute invalidity operates by law against everyone, while relative invalidity must be invoked by the affected person, for example where a party acted under a mistake. Until then, an act subject to relative invalidity is treated as valid.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer