Legal Q&A · IT, Software & E-commerce

Do I need a non-disclosure agreement, and what should it contain?

Law as at 21 July 2026

Short answer

Trade secrets are protected directly by law, and their violation constitutes unfair competition even without an agreement. An NDA still makes sense: it precisely defines confidentiality, duration and sanctions, making proof and enforcement considerably easier. A clear definition of confidential information, the confidentiality period and a written contractual penalty are central.

Does the law protect me without an NDA?

Trade secrets are protected directly by the Commercial Code. They comprise commercial, production or technical information that has value, is not readily available, is intended by its owner to remain secret, and is actually kept secret through the owner’s measures (Section 17). Violation is expressly classified as unfair competition (Section 44(2)(g)), against which remedies exist without any contract: cessation, removal of consequences, damages, appropriate satisfaction and restitution of unjust enrichment.

The difficulty is that statutory protection has strict requirements, particularly demonstrable secrecy measures. Not every sensitive piece of information qualifies, and proving that a particular item was a trade secret may be difficult in a dispute.

What does an NDA add?

A non-disclosure agreement helps here. Beyond statutory protection, it:

  • Extends protection to confidential information that may not meet the strict trade-secret requirements.
  • Precisely defines what is confidential and excluded, such as public information or independently developed material.
  • Sets the duration of the duty, including after cooperation ends.
  • Specifies the permitted purpose, who may access information and duties to return or destroy materials.

The contractual penalty gives an NDA strength

A contractual penalty is often the most effective element. It must be agreed in writing, specifying its amount or calculation method. It is then payable even if the breach causes no damage (Section 544 of the Civil Code). Compensation exceeding the penalty is available only if expressly agreed (Section 545(2)). The penalty should also be proportionate: a ruinous sanction may be reduced in litigation.

When drafting, we also consider whether the agreement should be unilateral or mutual, how it relates to the main contract and what restrictions apply to employees. Our non-disclosure agreement service prepares NDAs and confidentiality clauses, while software development confidentiality forms part of our IT development agreement service. If a leak has already occurred, we represent you in intellectual property disputes.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 21 July 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. What must we do to make shop and workplace CCTV lawful? CCTV is lawful when its legal basis is documented in advance, generally legitimate interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, and everyone entering the monitored area receives the required information. A balancing test comparing your interests with the privacy intrusion must exist before cameras start operating. At work, Section 13(4) of the Labour Code additionally requires prior consultation with employee representatives on the monitoring mechanism and notification to employees.
  2. Someone has applied for a trademark similar to ours. How and by when can we oppose it? Opposition is filed with the Slovak Industrial Property Office within three months of publication of the application in its bulletin. The deadline is strict: later additions, expanded grounds and evidence are disregarded, so the filing must be complete from the outset. Monitoring competitors' applications continuously is worthwhile. After registration, the longer route of an invalidity application remains.
  3. We have a registered trademark but do not use it. Can we lose it? Yes. If a mark has not been genuinely used in Slovakia for an uninterrupted period of at least five years, the Office revokes it on a third party's application. The law presumes non-use, which the owner must rebut. The same rule applies to EU marks under Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. An unused mark also weakens as an enforcement tool: in opposition proceedings, the other party can demand proof of genuine use.
  4. Is an accept-or-leave cookie banner lawful? No. Cookie consent must satisfy the GDPR and be freely given; accept or leave is not a real choice. The European Data Protection Board's consent guidelines expressly state that access to content must not depend on cookie consent. A banner therefore needs an equally prominent reject button on its first layer, and the website must work after rejection. The paid alternative, pay or consent, remains disputed.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer