New Civil Code · Commercial Contracts

Contract invalidity under the new rules: introducing avoidance

The new Civil Code changes the concept of contractual invalidity. Only what is currently absolutely invalid should remain invalid; relative invalidity will be replaced by avoidance subject to a shorter deadline. Greater transactional certainty, but less time to act.

Disputes over whether a contract is valid are among the longest in civil practice. The current Civil Code almost invites them: it distinguishes absolute and relative invalidity, and even a minor breach of the law is treated as a ground for invalidity, even when the breached legislation does not seek to address private law consequences. The new Civil Code reverses this approach.

Validity as the rule, invalidity as the exception

According to the recodification commission’s materials, the preference for absolute invalidity of legal acts is abandoned. Validity is preferred wherever consistent with the parties’ intentions, and court interventions declaring acts invalid should be minimised. Invalidity will mean only what is currently associated with absolute invalidity. Before finding it, the court will examine the purpose and meaning of the prohibiting rule, rather than mechanically invalidating an act for every breach of law. Established case-law conclusions are also codified, such as the rule that conflict with another contract does not itself cause invalidity.

Avoidance replaces relative invalidity

Relative invalidity disappears from the code, replaced by avoidance, primarily for defects of consent: unlawful threats, fraud and mistake, with fraud regulated separately from mistake. A key practical change is that the right to seek avoidance will expire after a shorter period than currently results from the unsystematic application of limitation to invoking relative invalidity. Expiry means the right is extinguished entirely once the deadline passes. Consistent with case law, protection of good-faith third parties is also strengthened: a person who honestly acquired rights should not suffer for defects they did not know about.

What this means for businesses

For ordinary commercial dealings, this is good news: transactions gain greater certainty that a formal defect will not overturn them years later. The other side is that anyone wishing to rely on a defect must act faster. A waiting strategy that sometimes works with relative invalidity will end with the expiry deadline. Templates also deserve attention: invalidity and severability clauses drafted for today’s dual system will need to be adapted.

When will the change arrive?

The government approved the draft Civil Code on 6 May 2026, and Parliament advanced it to second reading on 9 June 2026. The anticipated effective date is 1 July 2027. The wording may still change, but the direction is clear.

To understand how the new approach affects your templates and general terms, see our preparation for the new Civil Code. If you need a contract designed to handle the transition with minimal changes, we can prepare a bespoke commercial contract.

This article provides general legal information as at 16 July 2026. It does not constitute legal services or advice on your specific matter. Laws change and the details of your situation may differ. Check the appropriate course of action or contact us before making a decision.

Facing a similar situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer