Legal Q&A · Commercial Contracts

The other party wants an ‘irrevocable’ power of attorney as security for the deal. Can we give one?

Law as at 5 September 2026

Short answer

You can grant it, but the ‘irrevocable’ element will not work: a principal cannot validly waive the right to revoke authority at any time. A power of attorney is therefore not a security instrument, and a structure allowing the other party to transfer your assets to itself on default also comes dangerously close to prohibited appropriation of collateral. Protect the transaction through escrow, a pledge or conditions in the agreement itself.

In a company sale, property transaction or joint venture, a request sometimes arises: ‘Give us an irrevocable power of attorney so we can complete the transfer if you stop cooperating.’ We understand what the other party wants: certainty. But a power of attorney does not provide it and can harm you.

Irrevocability cannot validly be agreed

A power of attorney is a unilateral act based on trust. The Civil Code (Act No. 40/1964 Coll.) allows the principal to revoke it at any time and excludes any agreement to the contrary:

The principal cannot validly waive the right to revoke the power of attorney at any time.

— Section 33b(3) of the Civil Code (unofficial English translation)

An irrevocability clause is therefore ineffective, however solemnly it is worded. Anyone relying on it as transaction security holds a document the other party can switch off at any time with one sentence.

Revocation has its own rules

Revocation takes effect when the representative learns of it:

Until the representative knows of the revocation, their legal acts have the same effects as if the authority continued. However, this provision cannot be invoked by anyone who knew or must have known of the revocation.

— Section 33b(4) of the Civil Code (unofficial English translation)

Against a third party whom you informed of the authority, you may rely on revocation only if you notified that person before the representative acted (Section 33b(5)). Therefore, deliver revocation by a provable method to both the representative and everyone to whom the power of attorney was presented. Consider form requirements in advance from the other direction too: if the representative is to submit a land registration application, the principal’s signature on the power of attorney must be officially certified (Section 30(4) of the Cadastral Act).

Why a power of attorney is not security

A structure stating ‘if you default, we will transfer your assets to ourselves in your name’ circumvents pledge rules, including the prohibition of appropriation of collateral. We discuss how courts assess such packages of signed documents in prohibited appropriation of collateral. A representative acting for their own benefit against the principal’s interests also encounters the limits of representation, and the act’s validity can often be challenged. An ‘irrevocable’ power is thus doubly unstable for its recipient: it can be revoked, and whatever is acquired through it may be lost in litigation.

What actually secures the transaction?

For money, use lawyer or notarial escrow with precise release conditions. For performance of an obligation, use a pledge, explained for s. r. o. interests in pledges over an ownership interest, or a transfer of rights by way of security with a duty to account. For transaction completion, include conditions precedent and subsequent, contractual penalties and an alternative performance mechanism, and use a shareholder agreement between members. Reserve powers of attorney for their purpose: representation in acts you trust the representative to perform.

How we can help

We propose security proportionate to the transaction, from escrow and pledge agreements to transfers of rights by way of security, and include protections between members in shareholder agreements. We prepare powers of attorney in the correct form, including signature certification. If the other party is already requesting an irrevocable power, contact us before signing. A safe alternative is easier to find while the transaction can still be structured.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 5 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. My company is buying from a private individual. Does consumer law protect the seller against me? Merely designating a private individual as the seller does not exclude consumer protection. The general definition in Section 52 of the Civil Code asks whether the trader acts in the course of business and the individual outside it; status is not determined solely by who pays the price. Specific rules on consumer sales, withdrawal rights or information duties may, however, have a narrower scope. Each agreement and each rule must therefore be assessed separately when purchasing from individuals, without assuming either full protection or its complete exclusion.
  2. I am buying a car from Czechia. What should I check, and what must the agreement contain? First check the car in Czech registers using its VIN: technical data and inspection mileage, police theft alerts, insurance claim history, and whether the seller really owns it rather than a finance company. Then check the seller, particularly enforcement and insolvency. The agreement should contain representations about origin, condition and third-party rights, the exact transfer of ownership and risk, governing law and the court. Slovak registration requires recognition of the individually imported vehicle; if it is new under VAT law, VAT is paid in Slovakia.
  3. We paid a deposit under an agreement to enter into a future contract. Will we get it back if the deal falls through? Generally yes. Anything you pay before a contract is concluded is, under Section 498 of the Civil Code, an advance on the future price; if the future contract does not arise, the legal ground for the payment falls away and the other party must return it as unjust enrichment. It may retain the payment only to the extent that it has a claim of its own against you, typically under a contractual penalty or agreed withdrawal payment, or for damages if you frustrated the deal.
  4. We developed the patent jointly with a partner. What may each of us do without the other's consent? Unless you have agreed otherwise, each co-owner may exploit the invention themselves, regardless of the size of their share. A licence to a third party may be granted only with the consent of all co-owners, in Slovakia as well as in Czechia. Because the statutory rules favour whoever has the manufacturing capacity, exploitation, licences, fees and exit from the project belong in the agreement between the partners.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer