Legal Q&A · Compliance, Registers & Licences

Can a group of companies have a single shared data protection officer (DPO)?

Law as at 12 September 2026

Short answer

Yes. Article 37(2) GDPR allows a group of undertakings to appoint a single data protection officer provided they are easily accessible from each establishment. According to the guidelines of the European supervisory authorities, accessibility also means being able to communicate with data subjects and supervisory authorities in their language, which for a Slovak-Czech group means dealing with two authorities. Each company nevertheless remains a separate controller: it publishes the officer's contact details itself, notifies them to its own authority and must provide the conditions for the role to be performed.

A holding has a parent company, two operating companies in Slovakia and one in the Czech Republic. One of them must have a data protection officer, because it monitors customers systematically on a large scale; the others want one for safety’s sake. Appointing three or four different officers would be expensive and impractical. The GDPR anticipates this situation.

What the Regulation allows

The rule is brief:

A group of undertakings may appoint a single data protection officer provided that a data protection officer is easily accessible from each establishment.

— Article 37(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)

The data protection officer may be an employee of one of the companies or may fulfil the role on the basis of a service contract (Article 37(6)). A group may therefore have a shared in-house specialist or an external provider. Slovak Act No. 18/2018 Coll. has its own rules on data protection officers in Section 44, but its second and third parts do not apply to processing governed directly by the GDPR (Section 3(2) of Act No. 18/2018 Coll.). For ordinary commercial companies, Article 37 GDPR is therefore decisive.

What “easily accessible” means

The Article 29 Working Party guidelines on data protection officers (WP243 rev.01), endorsed by the European Data Protection Board on 25 May 2018, interpret accessibility through the officer’s tasks. They are a contact point for data subjects and the supervisory authority, but also within the company, where they advise management and staff. They must be able to communicate efficiently with data subjects and to cooperate with supervisory authorities, and to do so in the language or languages used by those authorities and persons. Physical presence at each establishment is not required; a hotline or another secure communication channel is sufficient, provided it genuinely works.

For a group with companies in both Slovakia and the Czech Republic, it follows that the officer must be able to handle communication with both the Slovak and the Czech data protection authority and to answer customers and employees in both countries in their own language. They must also be familiar with the national rules that supplement the GDPR in each country.

Each company remains a controller

A shared data protection officer does not mean shared responsibility. Each company must publish the officer’s contact details and communicate them to the supervisory authority (Article 37(7)), involve them properly and in a timely manner in all data protection matters, and provide them with resources and access to processing operations (Article 38(1) and (2)). The officer must not receive any instructions regarding the performance of their tasks and reports directly to the highest management level (Article 38(3)). For a group, this means in practice that their tasks must be secured separately in each company, not only in the parent.

Watch out for conflicts of interest. The officer may fulfil other tasks, but these must not result in a conflict of interests (Article 38(6)). Under WP243, that excludes in particular positions that determine the purposes and means of processing, typically senior management and the heads of IT, HR or marketing. Within a group, this also extends to managers of the parent company who in fact decide on processing in the subsidiaries.

How to set this up

We recommend a single decision or contract appointing the officer by name for each company, defining the scope of their work in each of them and regulating who provides them with cooperation. Each company then notifies its own authority of the contact details and publishes them on its website. When a data protection officer is mandatory and what they do is explained on our data protection officer (DPO) as a service page; within that service we can take on the role for a group with both Slovak and Czech companies. How the authority calculates a fine for breach of duties is shown in how the authority calculates a GDPR fine.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 12 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Our transport manager is leaving. How much time do we have to replace them without losing the authorisation? A change in the person of the transport manager must be notified to the district office in the regional capital within 15 days, and you may operate transport only with an appointed transport manager who effectively and continuously manages the transport activities. Regulation (EC) No. 1071/2009 allows the authority to set a period of up to six months to appoint a replacement where the transport manager ceases to satisfy the requirements of good repute or professional competence; on the transport manager’s death or physical incapacity, it may be extended by three months. The period is not automatic and concerns the fate of the authorisation. The Act does not rule out a fine for operating without a transport manager even during that period, so arrange a replacement while the notice period is still running.
  2. We trace debtors' assets and gather information on companies for clients. Do we need a detective service licence? If you carry out such activities for clients, generally yes. Act No. 473/2005 Coll. on Private Security expressly treats the tracing of property, the gathering of information on a person's financial circumstances and the gathering of information in connection with debt recovery as detective services, and a detective service may be operated only under a licence from a regional Police Force directorate. Activities carried out as part of an activity under special regulations are an exception. Operating without a licence risks a fine of EUR 3,319 to EUR 66,387 and an activity ban.
  3. We are selling a company holding a private security licence and the managing director is changing. Will the licence remain valid? On a sale of a business interest, yes: the licence stays with the company to which it was granted; the licence itself cannot be transferred, so a buyer does not acquire it on a sale of the enterprise. The new managing director must, however, meet the same conditions as on the grant of the licence, and a new member holding an interest of at least 15% must be of good character and reliable, with changes notified to the regional directorate within 15 days. If the sole managing director leaves, or a statutory representative ceases to meet the conditions, the regional Police Force directorate suspends operation for up to three months and, if the grounds persist after that period, withdraws the licence.
  4. We want to issue our own token. Do we need authorisation under MiCA? For an ordinary token that is not a stablecoin, generally no. A public offer of such a token requires no regulatory authorisation, but it does require a legal person, a crypto-asset white paper notified to the competent authority at least 20 working days before publication, and compliance with the duties of a person offering crypto-assets. A different regime applies to stablecoins: an asset-referenced token requires authorisation under MiCA, and an e-money token may be offered only by a credit institution or an electronic money institution. You also need authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider if, alongside the issue, you provide clients with crypto-asset services, such as exchanging the token for money or holding it in custody.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer