Legal Q&A · Compliance, Registers & Licences

We no longer do business with the State. Should we be removed from the RPVS, or is ending the arrangement with our authorised person enough?

Law as at 12 September 2026

Short answer

If you are no longer a public sector partner and are no longer receiving performance under any contract, the correct route is removal from the register, applied for by your authorised person while they are still registered. Were the authorised person to apply for their own removal only, you would remain in the register and would have to secure a new authorised person within 30 days of that removal. Voluntary removal does not in itself trigger the two-year bar on fresh registration, but it does not end proceedings already commenced on the verification of beneficial owner data.

The contract has ended, the grant has been accounted for, and the company plans no further business with the public sector. Registration in the Register of Public Sector Partners (RPVS) does not, however, end by itself. It is made for an indefinite period (Section 7(3) of Act No. 315/2016 Coll.) and, while it lasts, so does the duty to verify beneficial owners as at 31 December each year (Section 11(2)). When a company decides to part with the register, it matters whether the company itself is removed or only its authorised person.

Two different removals

The Act distinguishes removal of the partner from removal of the authorised person. Removal of the partner is carried out by the registering authority on the application of the authorised person (Section 10(1)). It is filed exclusively electronically by the authorised person entered in the register, because all applications on the partner’s behalf are made by them alone (Section 5(1) and (2)). By this step the company leaves the register altogether.

Removal of the authorised person at their own request is something different. The company remains in the register, merely losing the person who acts for it, and the Act requires it to secure the registration of a new authorised person no later than 30 days after the removal, including fresh verification of the beneficial owners (Section 10(2)). If the company simply terminates the agreement and the lawyer has themselves removed, the company stays in the register and the period starts to run. The order of steps therefore matters: first removal of the partner, and only then termination of the agreement with the authorised person.

When removal is safe

What is decisive is whether the contract for which you registered is still running:

A public sector partner must be registered in the register at least for the duration of the contract. For the purposes of this Act, the duration of the contract under the preceding sentence means the period during which the public sector partner receives funds or acquires property, rights to property or other proprietary rights.

— Section 4(1) of Act No. 315/2016 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

While payments are still coming in under a public contract, such as final invoices or retention money, removal is premature. If removal of the partner on the application of the authorised person were to occur during the term of the contract, the other party acquires the right to withdraw from it (Section 15(1)). Before filing, therefore, go through all contracts, amendments and framework agreements, not only the one for which you once registered. An application, including an application for removal, cannot be withdrawn (Section 5(5)), so the decision must be made beforehand.

Consider the outlook as well. If you expect a new contract in the near future, fresh registration will mean identification from scratch, and verification is required in any event when a contract above the statutory threshold is concluded (Section 11(2)(d)). Finally, the Act permits registration at their own request even by a person who is not a public sector partner; such a person has the duties of a partner, but Sections 13 to 15 on sanctions and consequences for contracts do not apply to them (Section 17).

What voluntary removal will not solve

The two-year bar on fresh registration attaches to removal by a decision of the registering authority in proceedings on the verification of beneficial owner data (Section 12(7)) or for an unpaid fine (Section 13(2) and Section 13a), not to ordinary voluntary removal. If, however, proceedings on the accuracy of beneficial owner data are already under way, the registering authority completes them after a voluntary removal (Section 12(8)). Where the partner fails to defend the data credibly, proceedings on a fine and the two-year bar follow, and the statutory representative becomes a disqualified person under the Commercial Code (Section 14). Removal is therefore no escape from a problem that has already arisen. Nor does the Act attach to removal the extinction of liability for earlier breaches of duty, such as late notification of a change of beneficial owner.

How to proceed

First check that you are no longer receiving performance under any contract and that no proceedings under Section 12 are pending against the company. Then ask your authorised person to file an application for removal of the partner, and terminate the agreement with them only after the removal has been registered. If, on the contrary, you need to remain in the register and only the authorised person is changing, the procedure is described in changing an RPVS authorised person and the consequences of delay in what happens without RPVS registration.

We assess whether removal is safe in your situation and handle the removal, or the takeover of the authorised person’s role, through our change and removal of an RPVS authorised person service. If you are staying in the register, ongoing care is provided by our RPVS registration and authorised person service.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 12 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Can our regular lawyer or auditor act as our RPVS authorised person? Yes. An ordinary relationship with a lawyer, notary, auditor, tax adviser or bank that arose in the performance of their profession does not, under the Act, call the authorised person's impartiality into question. Excluded, however, is anyone who is themselves the partner or beneficial owner in the matter, who shares a beneficial owner with the company, or who is personally or through ownership connected with the company or members of its bodies. A breach of the prohibition is punishable by a fine imposed on the authorised person, the company and its statutory representative alike.
  2. We are on the List of Economic Operators. What must we still submit with a tender? Registration proves only the participation requirements concerning personal standing, that is good repute, up-to-date contributions and taxes, absence of bankruptcy, authorisation to conduct business and absence of a ban on participation. A tender must still include evidence of financial and economic standing and of technical or professional capacity where the contracting authority requires it, and a statutory declaration on persons with decisive influence under Section 32(7). Certificates on contributions and taxes may be requested subsequently even from a registered company, and registration may be lost before its validity expires.
  3. Who is a beneficial owner, and how are they identified? A beneficial owner is always an individual, never a company. In a company, this particularly includes anyone with a direct or indirect interest of at least 25% in voting rights or registered capital, the right to appoint or remove statutory or supervisory bodies, control by other means, or entitlement to at least 25% of the economic benefit. If no such individual can be identified, senior management, meaning the statutory body, is treated as the beneficial owner.
  4. What happens if we are not registered in RPVS or miss annual verification? The consequence is more than a fine. If beneficial owner verification is missing, the public-sector counterparty is not in default when it withholds performance for that reason, so it may lawfully withhold payment of your invoice. False or incomplete data can bring a company fine equal to the economic benefit obtained, or otherwise EUR 10,000–1,000,000, and EUR 10,000–100,000 for the statutory representative. The two-year re-registration ban arises in the sanction cases governed by Section 13a, not after every voluntary deletion.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer