Legal Q&A · Commercial Contracts

Our commercial agent is taking clients after the agreement ended. Will the non-compete clause hold up?

Law as at 29 August 2026

Short answer

It depends on the wording. The Commercial Code permits restrictions on an agent's competing activity for up to two years after the agreement ends, within a defined territory or for a defined group of customers there. A clause targeting your customer base has prospects of enforcement; a blanket prohibition on doing business may be restricted or declared invalid by the court. Do not confuse this with an employee non-compete, which has separate, stricter requirements.

The agency relationship has ended, and clients whom the agent served on your behalf for years are leaving too. Whether this can be prevented depends on one provision in the agency agreement: the non-compete clause. Its fate was usually decided at signing, rather than in court.

The statutory limits

Section 672a of the Commercial Code (Act No. 513/1991 Coll.) regulates commercial agents’ non-compete clauses and sets three simultaneous conditions: writing, limited duration and limited scope.

The agreement may provide in writing that, for no more than two years after it ends, the commercial agent may not, on their own account or another person’s account, within a defined territory or in relation to a defined group of customers there, carry on the activity covered by the agency or another activity competing with the principal’s business.

— Section 672a(1) of the Commercial Code (unofficial English translation)

A safeguard against excessive restrictions also applies: a court may restrict or invalidate a clause that limits the agent more than necessary to protect the principal (Section 672a(2)).

Scope determines whether the clause survives

Clauses fail because they prohibit everything, rather than because they protect too specifically. A blanket ban on operating in the sector is a textbook candidate for restriction or invalidity. By contrast, a clause targeting only your customers is much easier to defend because it leaves the rest of the market open.

Recent Czech case law on a similarly structured provision illustrates this. In judgment 21 Co 23/2025 of 16 April 2025, the Regional Court in Prague upheld an insurance intermediary’s obligation to pay a contractual penalty under a two-year clause covering all of Czechia, even without separate compensation for the restriction. The court considered the defined group of persons decisive: the clause prohibited activity only towards the principal’s clients, excluded clients the agent already had before the agreement, and left the agent free to do business with anyone else.

Do not confuse it with an employee clause

Employees have a different regime: Section 83a of the Labour Code makes validity conditional on mandatory financial compensation, a maximum duration of one year and inclusion directly in the employment contract. We discuss it in detail in is a post-employment non-compete valid. If the agent actually works as an employee, the relationship risks being assessed under employment law and its stricter conditions. The agreement’s label alone offers no protection.

Drafting a clause that can withstand scrutiny

The agreement needs a precise duration, no more than two years, territory, group of persons and description of the prohibited activity linked to the agency’s subject matter. The group will usually be customers the agent served or learned about during the agency. An exception for clients the agent brought in, or payment for refraining from competition, helps balance the clause. A reasonable contractual penalty provides the sanction; enforcement then depends on documenting the diversion of clients.

How we can help

We draft or review the clause through commercial agency agreements and extend customer protection to distribution and franchise agreements. If the agent is already taking clients, we assess the clause and penalty’s prospects and take over court representation. Have the clause reviewed before you need to rely on it.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 29 August 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. As a self-employed contractor, I signed a three-year non-compete. Is it enforceable? A three-year clause carries a serious risk of invalidity, but the outcome depends on the true nature of the cooperation, the restriction's scope and its proportionality. The two-year limit in Section 672a applies directly to commercial agency; courts have applied its criteria by analogy to other agreements in particular cases. It is therefore unsafe to claim that every three-year non-compete imposed on every self-employed contractor is automatically invalid. The securing penalty and whether the cooperation was actually dependent work must also be examined.
  2. The other party wants an ‘irrevocable’ power of attorney as security for the deal. Can we give one? You can grant it, but the ‘irrevocable’ element will not work: a principal cannot validly waive the right to revoke authority at any time. A power of attorney is therefore not a security instrument, and a structure allowing the other party to transfer your assets to itself on default also comes dangerously close to prohibited appropriation of collateral. Protect the transaction through escrow, a pledge or conditions in the agreement itself.
  3. My company is buying from a private individual. Does consumer law protect the seller against me? Merely designating a private individual as the seller does not exclude consumer protection. The general definition in Section 52 of the Civil Code asks whether the trader acts in the course of business and the individual outside it; status is not determined solely by who pays the price. Specific rules on consumer sales, withdrawal rights or information duties may, however, have a narrower scope. Each agreement and each rule must therefore be assessed separately when purchasing from individuals, without assuming either full protection or its complete exclusion.
  4. I am buying a car from Czechia. What should I check, and what must the agreement contain? First check the car in Czech registers using its VIN: technical data and inspection mileage, police theft alerts, insurance claim history, and whether the seller really owns it rather than a finance company. Then check the seller, particularly enforcement and insolvency. The agreement should contain representations about origin, condition and third-party rights, the exact transfer of ownership and risk, governing law and the court. Slovak registration requires recognition of the individually imported vehicle; if it is new under VAT law, VAT is paid in Slovakia.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer