Legal Q&A · Company financing

Can self-employed contractors, such as developers outside employment, also receive ESOP equity?

Law as at 1 August 2026

Short answer

In a simple joint-stock company, yes. Section 220r(1)(b) of the Commercial Code expressly covers not only employees but also individuals operating under a trade licence or other authorisation whose work for the company is protected by intellectual property rights. In a joint-stock company, the statutory shortcuts apply only to employees. In an s. r. o., contractors are accommodated through options over members' interests or phantom equity.

Does the law also cover contractors in a j. s. a.?

A simple joint-stock company may subscribe for its own shares intended for transfer to employees and also to other individuals operating under a trade licence or other authorisation whose work for the company is protected by intellectual property rights (Section 220r(1)(b) of the Commercial Code). This fits software companies precisely: a self-employed developer delivering code to the company can participate alongside permanent employees.

What condition does the law impose?

Contractor participation depends on the results of their work being subject to intellectual property rights, which must be contractually addressed between the contractor and company. If licences or assignment of the exercise of economic rights in the delivered work are not covered, the programme may encounter problems both under Section 220r and during an investor’s legal due diligence. Our copyright and licensing service addresses the contractual arrangements for software.

Other routes apply in an a. s. and s. r. o.

In a joint-stock company, the statutory facilitations — preferential subscription on a capital increase, acquisition of own shares for transfer within 12 months, and use of profit shares — apply only to the company’s employees. An s. r. o. cannot hold its own interests as a pool at all. Outside a j. s. a., contractors are therefore offered options over existing members’ or shareholders’ interests, or phantom equity providing a cash entitlement linked to company value.

Our ESOP and employee equity service assesses how to build a single programme for a mixed team of employees and contractors, and whether changing the company’s legal form is worthwhile.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 1 August 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Is it enough to state in the materials that this is a private offer? No. The National Bank of Slovakia assesses a communication in substance, based on its content. A different formal title is not decisive, and a disclaimer or statement that it is a private offer does not prevent classification as a public offer. The NBS expressly adds that private offer is not a legally defined term; issuers use it for offers that do not meet the characteristics of a public offer.
  2. When do we need a prospectus for a bond issue? Slovakia's volume exemption applies to public offers with total consideration in the EU below EUR 5,000,000 per issuer or offeror over the relevant 12-month period. Relevant offers are aggregated under Article 3(2c) of the Prospectus Regulation; offers for which a prospectus has been published and offers exempt under Article 1(4) are excluded. If you rely on the volume exemption under Section 120(2), the prescribed document must be submitted to the NBS and made available to the public. Duties under other exemptions must be assessed separately.
  3. We offer bonds to fewer than 150 investors. When will the exemption fail? What matters is who the offer is addressed to, rather than how many people ultimately buy the bond. The communication must clearly show that it targets no more than 149 persons, for example by defining the recipient category. If basic bond information is published on a publicly accessible website, the National Bank of Slovakia treats it as a public offer requiring a prospectus. Saying the page serves only investors already contacted does not satisfy the exemption.
  4. How should an offer intended only for qualified investors be labelled? The communication must unambiguously state that the public offer is exclusively for qualified investors, using wording that leaves no room for conflicting interpretations and presentation that makes it stand out. The exemption applies only to that offer: for a subsequent sale or admission to a regulated market, the prospectus requirement and any applicable exemption must be assessed afresh.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer