Legal Q&A · Company financing

How should an offer intended only for qualified investors be labelled?

Law as at 10 September 2026

Short answer

The communication must unambiguously state that the public offer is exclusively for qualified investors, using wording that leaves no room for conflicting interpretations and presentation that makes it stand out. The exemption applies only to that offer: for a subsequent sale or admission to a regulated market, the prospectus requirement and any applicable exemption must be assessed afresh.

It must be visible, not merely mentioned

An offer of securities exclusively to qualified investors is one of the exemptions from publishing an approved prospectus. However, the National Bank of Slovakia’s guidance on public offers of securities imposes two specific labelling requirements:

  • The communication must state that the public offer is intended exclusively for qualified investors, in wording that does not allow ambiguous interpretations.
  • This information must be presented so that it stands out from the rest of the communication.

A statement hidden in a footer, footnote or disclaimer paragraph does not meet this requirement. The reader should see it before engaging with the offer.

The exemption attaches to the offer, not the security

Another frequently overlooked point is that the exemption concerns a specific offer. Under Article 5(1) of the Prospectus Regulation, every subsequent resale is assessed as a separate offer: it must be determined afresh whether it constitutes a public offer and whether it qualifies for an exemption under Article 1(4). For admission to a regulated market, the exemptions under Article 1(5) are assessed separately. A prospectus may be required, but it is not mandatory for every subsequent resale or admission.

If an issuer places an issue with qualified investors without a prospectus and later considers broader distribution or admission to a regulated market, the prospectus requirement must be reassessed in light of that specific next step. When planning an issue, it is therefore worth deciding what should happen to the bonds at the next stage.

Exemptions can be combined

The Prospectus Regulation permits exemptions to be combined if their conditions are met simultaneously. A single offer may therefore target qualified investors, investors acquiring at least EUR 100,000, the issuer’s employees and a limited number of other non-qualified investors not exceeding 149 persons, while remaining exempt from prospectus publication. Each exemption relied upon must independently satisfy its requirements.

See also when the exemption for fewer than 150 investors fails and why calling it a private offer is not enough.

See the scope and process of our bond issuance service in Slovakia.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 10 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Is it enough to state in the materials that this is a private offer? No. The National Bank of Slovakia assesses a communication in substance, based on its content. A different formal title is not decisive, and a disclaimer or statement that it is a private offer does not prevent classification as a public offer. The NBS expressly adds that private offer is not a legally defined term; issuers use it for offers that do not meet the characteristics of a public offer.
  2. When do we need a prospectus for a bond issue? Slovakia's volume exemption applies to public offers with total consideration in the EU below EUR 5,000,000 per issuer or offeror over the relevant 12-month period. Relevant offers are aggregated under Article 3(2c) of the Prospectus Regulation; offers for which a prospectus has been published and offers exempt under Article 1(4) are excluded. If you rely on the volume exemption under Section 120(2), the prescribed document must be submitted to the NBS and made available to the public. Duties under other exemptions must be assessed separately.
  3. We offer bonds to fewer than 150 investors. When will the exemption fail? What matters is who the offer is addressed to, rather than how many people ultimately buy the bond. The communication must clearly show that it targets no more than 149 persons, for example by defining the recipient category. If basic bond information is published on a publicly accessible website, the National Bank of Slovakia treats it as a public offer requiring a prospectus. Saying the page serves only investors already contacted does not satisfy the exemption.
  4. How long does NBS prospectus approval take? The standard prospectus approval period is 10 working days from submission of the application. For an issuer with no securities admitted to trading on a regulated market that has never offered securities to the public, the first draft has a 20-working-day period. A prospectus supplement is approved within 5 working days. Crucially, deficiencies restart the period when remedied: the quality of the initial submission determines the overall time, rather than the statutory period alone.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer