Legal Q&A · Commercial Contracts

What will change for commercial agency agreements under the new Civil Code bill?

Law as at 19 September 2026 · updated 19 September 2026

Short answer

Under the government bill, commercial agency would be governed by the new Civil Code and would continue to follow the European directive on commercial agents. The rules on commission, notice periods and non-compete clauses remain similar at their core, but the indemnity would be renamed special remuneration with a new ceiling where the cooperation lasted less than a year, and the bill expressly lists the terms that would be invalid or that would be disregarded where they operate to the agent's detriment. The bill has not yet been passed, today's agreements are governed by Section 652 et seq. of the Commercial Code, and the obligations part of that Code is to be removed only by a separate implementing amendment.

Anyone building a sales network through commercial agents has agreements based on Section 652 et seq. of the Commercial Code (Act No. 513/1991 Zb.). The government bill for a new Civil Code, before the National Council as parliamentary print 1312, places the commercial agency contract in the new code. The bill itself does not repeal the Commercial Code rules — its repealing provision does not touch the Commercial Code at all, and the obligations part of that Code is to be removed only by a separate implementing amendment. On 15 September 2026 the Constitutional Law Committee recommended that the bill be passed as amended; the final wording will be decided by the plenary and the bill envisages an effective date of 1 July 2027. The comparison below is based on the wording submitted to the National Council, and the amendments proposed by the committee are noted separately. Once passed, the sections of the bill will be renumbered, which is why we cite the numbering of print 1312.

What stays

The rules continue to transpose Council Directive 86/653/EEC on self-employed commercial agents, which the bill lists among the acts transposed in its annex. The core would therefore not change: commission on transactions concluded as a result of the agent’s activity, the latest point at which the right to commission arises and its quarterly due date, the commission statement, notice periods increasing with the length of the cooperation from one to three months, and a non-compete clause of no more than two years after termination. The contract would still have to be in writing.

What changes

Definition. Under the bill, a commercial agent undertakes to carry on activity aimed at concluding transactions “on a long-term basis”, and the principal undertakes to pay the agent remuneration (Section 1072 of the bill). Today’s Section 652(1) speaks of commission and does not contain the words “on a long-term basis”. The bill also distinguishes remuneration as a whole from commission as the part of it that depends on the number or value of the transactions concluded. The Constitutional Law Committee proposes to refine that distinction: commission is to mean remuneration tied to the number or value of transactions, and in the rules on the creation, due date, statement and lapse of the entitlement the word “commission” is to be replaced by “remuneration” (points 194 to 197 of the joint report).

The indemnity would become special remuneration. The agent’s entitlement on termination, governed today by Section 669 as an indemnity, is called special remuneration in the bill. The conditions for its creation and the ceiling of the average annual commission over the last five years remain essentially the same. As to the grounds on which it does not arise, instead of the principal’s withdrawal from the contract the bill speaks of the principal having ended the agency for a breach giving rise to a right of withdrawal (Section 1094 of the bill). A rule for short cooperation is added as well:

[…] where the commercial agency lasted less than one year, it may not exceed the aggregate of the commercial agent’s commissions for the entire duration of the agency.

— Section 1092(2) of the government bill for a Civil Code, parliamentary print 1312 (unofficial English translation)

The agent must claim the special remuneration from the principal within one year of the termination of the agency, failing which the right lapses (Section 1093 of the bill). Today’s Section 669(5) links the lapse to the agent’s failure, within the same period, to give notice that they are asserting their rights.

Non-compete clause. Today, in case of doubt a court may restrict or declare invalid a clause restricting the agent more than the necessary degree of protection of the principal requires (Section 672a(2)). The bill leaves the court only the power to restrict it (Section 1095(2) of the bill). How this will play out in the courts cannot yet be said.

An express list of prohibited terms. Today, which provisions on commercial agency cannot be departed from follows from the common list in Section 263(1) of the Commercial Code. The bill says so directly in the commercial agency rules and distinguishes two groups (Section 1096 of the bill). Terms departing from, or excluding, the agent’s basic duties and the principal’s duties are invalid. Terms departing, to the agent’s detriment, from the rules on the latest point at which the right to commission arises and on its due date, on the commission statement, on the lapse of the right to commission, on the statutory notice periods and on the special remuneration, are disregarded. A term by which the agent waived the special remuneration in advance would therefore have no effect under the bill either.

What this means for today’s agreements

Under the bill’s transitional provisions, agreements concluded before the effective date would continue to be governed by the Commercial Code unless the parties agree otherwise in writing (Sections 1889(3) and (4) of the bill). More on this in our answer on contracts concluded before the new code takes effect. For the duration and grounds of termination of a franchise contract the bill refers to the application, mutatis mutandis, of the provisions on commercial agency; the details are discussed in our article on the franchise contract in the new Civil Code bill.

Agreements with agents signed today must be drafted under the Commercial Code in force. It is nevertheless worth keeping out of them terms that already conflict with mandatory provisions and would not stand under the bill either, typically an advance waiver of the indemnity. We prepare or review the agreement through commercial agency agreements. If you want to go through the entire contractual documentation of a sales network, use our preparation for the new Civil Code.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 19 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. There is an ambiguous provision in our contract template. Will a court construe it in our favour? Probably not. A court first looks for the parties' intention and the usual meaning of the expression, taking account of the negotiations and past practice. If doubt remains, an expression allowing different interpretations is construed against the party that used it first in the dealings. With your own template that party is usually you, in Slovakia as well as in Czechia.
  2. Our salesperson signed a contract on terms our internal template does not permit. Is the company bound? Generally yes. A person entrusted with a particular activity in the operation of a business is authorised to carry out all the acts that ordinarily occur in it. Where they exceed that authorisation, the company is not bound only if the partner knew or could have known of the excess. An internal instruction to sign only the approved template therefore protects the company externally only where the partner is aware of it.
  3. May our commercial agent also represent a competitor during the term of our agreement? If you have agreed neither exclusivity nor any other prohibition, then generally yes. Under a non-exclusive agency the Commercial Code allows the agent to carry on the same activity for other persons; under an exclusive agency they may not do so within the agreed scope, and a breach entitles you to withdraw from the contract. Even a non-exclusive agent, however, is bound to have regard to your interests and not to misuse the information obtained from you.
  4. We want to end a mandate contract. When does the notice take effect and what must we pay the mandatary? As the mandator you may terminate a mandate contract under the Commercial Code at any time, in whole or in part; unless the notice specifies a later date, it takes effect on the day the mandatary learned or could have learned of it. The mandatary is, however, entitled to reimbursement of necessary and purposefully incurred costs and to a proportionate part of the remuneration for the activity properly carried out until the notice takes effect. The mandatary may also terminate, but their notice takes effect only at the end of the calendar month following the month in which it was delivered to you.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer