Legal Q&A · Commercial Contracts

We want to end a mandate contract. When does the notice take effect and what must we pay the mandatary?

Law as at 12 September 2026

Short answer

As the mandator you may terminate a mandate contract under the Commercial Code at any time, in whole or in part; unless the notice specifies a later date, it takes effect on the day the mandatary learned or could have learned of it. The mandatary is, however, entitled to reimbursement of necessary and purposefully incurred costs and to a proportionate part of the remuneration for the activity properly carried out until the notice takes effect. The mandatary may also terminate, but their notice takes effect only at the end of the calendar month following the month in which it was delivered to you.

You engaged another company to arrange a commercial matter for you, for instance to handle suppliers, manage orders or conclude contracts on your behalf. The cooperation has stopped working and you want to end it, but the contract says nothing about termination, or says only something general. Under a mandate contract governed by the Commercial Code (Act No. 513/1991 Zb.), the answer is favourable to the mandator: you may terminate at any time, but the mandatary is entitled to payment for what they have already properly carried out.

The mandator may terminate at any time

A mandate contract rests on trust. The mandatary arranges the matter for your account and in accordance with your instructions (Sections 566 and 567), so the statute allows the mandator to end the relationship without stating a reason and without a notice period:

The mandator may terminate the contract at any time, in part or in whole.

— Section 574(1) of the Commercial Code (unofficial English translation)

Unless the notice specifies a later effective date, it takes effect on the day the mandatary learned or could have learned of it (Section 574(2)). From that day, the mandatary must not continue the activity covered by the notice. They must, however, alert you to the measures needed to prevent imminent damage arising from the activity being left unfinished (Section 574(3)). If the mandatary is, for instance, negotiating a contract for you, it is worth choosing the date of the notice so that you are able to take the negotiations over.

What you will pay the mandatary

Termination does not extinguish the entitlement for work the mandatary has already carried out:

For activity properly carried out before the notice takes effect, the mandatary is entitled to reimbursement of the costs incurred under Section 572 and to a proportionate part of the remuneration.

— Section 574(4) of the Commercial Code (unofficial English translation)

The costs under Section 572 are those the mandatary incurred necessarily or purposefully, where they are not already included in the remuneration. The phrase “a proportionate part of the remuneration” raises the most questions of interpretation. The statute does not define it, so it is generally assessed by reference to how much of the agreed activity was properly carried out before the notice took effect. It helps if the contract divides the remuneration into stages or if the activity is reported on an ongoing basis. Where no amount of remuneration has been agreed, the mandatary is entitled to the remuneration usual for comparable activity at the time the contract was concluded (Section 571(1)). Unless the contract provides otherwise, the entitlement to remuneration arises on the activity being properly carried out, regardless of whether it produced the expected outcome (Section 571(2)).

When the mandatary gives notice

The mandatary is bound more strictly. Under Section 575(1), they may terminate with effect at the end of the calendar month following the month in which the notice was delivered to you, unless the notice indicates a later time. If an interruption of their activity would cause you damage, they must alert you to the measures that need to be taken. If you cannot take them, even with the help of others, and you ask the mandatary to do so, they must take them themselves (Section 575(2)). For activity between the notice and its taking effect, they are entitled to reimbursement of costs and to a part of the remuneration proportionate to the result achieved (Section 575(4)).

What to agree in advance

Sections 574 and 575 are not among the provisions from which Section 263(1) prohibits departure. The contract may therefore modify them, and in long-term cooperation it is worth doing so:

  • a notice period for the mandator as well, where you need the mandatary to complete or properly hand over work in progress,
  • a method of calculating the remuneration on early termination, for instance by stages or by hours worked, so that “a proportionate part” does not become the subject of a dispute,
  • a duty to hand over materials and to report on work in progress as at the date the notice takes effect.

A different regime applies to brokerage. Where a brokerage contract does not set a period for concluding the brokered contract, either party may end it by notifying the other (Section 650). The broker’s entitlement to commission may nevertheless materialise after it has ended; the details are discussed in our article on commission for commercial agents and brokers.

If you are ending the cooperation or merely preparing the contract, send it to us. Through mandate and brokerage agreements we assess what the mandatary is entitled to on termination and propose wording under which ending the cooperation does not end in a dispute over remuneration.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 12 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. We are running a project with a Czech university funded from Czech public support. Who will own the results? Unless the project is a public contract, rights to the results belong to the recipient of the support under Section 16 of Act No. 130/2002 Sb. Where a company and a research organisation are joint recipients, the statute offers three models: the research organisation keeps the rights to its own results, the rights are divided according to the extent of participation, or the company pays a market price for them. The model must be chosen in the agreement between the partners and aligned with the funding provider's terms.
  2. Is a non-disclosure agreement confirmed by email or by a click in a data room enough? The confidentiality undertaking itself may be formed by email or by a click, because neither Slovak nor Czech law prescribes any particular form for it unless the parties have reserved one. In Slovakia, however, the contractual penalty on which an NDA usually rests may be agreed only in writing. An electronic act satisfies the writing requirement if it captures the content and identifies the person who acted; a qualified electronic signature always satisfies it. For an NDA governed by Slovak law we therefore recommend a signature, and where a click is used, at least a reliable record of who confirmed which wording.
  3. The recipient under our NDA wants to show our information to its advisers and subcontractors. Who is liable if they leak it? A non-disclosure agreement binds only those who entered into it; the recipient's adviser or subcontractor is not bound by it. A recipient who passes the information to someone outside the permitted circle breaches the NDA themselves. Where the recipient performs their obligations through another person, they are liable under Section 331 of the Commercial Code as if performing themselves; that rule will not, however, apply reliably to every type of adviser. The NDA should therefore deal expressly with the circle of third parties, how they are bound and the recipient's liability for them.
  4. The other party returned our contract template with changes it did not mark. Is what we signed binding? Generally yes. Under Slovak law, a reply that adds changes to your offer is a new offer, and whoever signs it accepts it together with the changes they overlooked. A defence is available only exceptionally, where the other party caused the mistake or must have known of it; invalidity must be invoked and the circumstances proved. Comparing every returned version against the approved template before signing is more reliable.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer