Legal Q&A · Debt Recovery

Our debtor obtained a personal bankruptcy discharge. Is our claim permanently lost?

Law as at 29 August 2026

Short answer

Not necessarily. Discharge makes the claim unenforceable against the debtor but does not extinguish it: voluntary payment remains possible, as does recovery from a guarantor or security. Statutorily listed claims remain unaffected, including child maintenance and intentionally caused damage. If the debtor lacked honest intent, discharge may be challenged within six years.

An individual obtains debt discharge through bankruptcy or an instalment plan under Part Four of Act No. 7/2005 Coll. on Bankruptcy and Restructuring. For a creditor, this usually means halted enforcement and a letter from the trustee. It does not necessarily end the claim, however.

Unenforceable does not mean extinguished

Upon discharge, claims satisfiable only in bankruptcy or through an instalment plan […] become unenforceable against the debtor to the extent of the court’s discharge, regardless of whether they were lodged.

Section 166e(2) of Act No. 7/2005 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

The debt legally remains, but cannot be compelled through court or enforcement. The court considers unenforceability even without a debtor’s objection. Ongoing enforcement is therefore terminated (Section 167f of Act No. 7/2005 Coll., with enforcement procedure under Section 61n of Act No. 233/1995 Coll.). Later voluntary payment satisfies an existing debt, so retaining the claim in records and leaving an instalment option open can make sense.

Whom discharge does not protect

Discharge protects only the debtor. A claim unenforceable against them remains enforceable against a guarantor or another person securing it (Section 166e(3)). A secured creditor may also obtain satisfaction from collateral without lodging a claim (Section 166c(2)). Before writing off the debt, check guarantors, co-debtors and security.

Which claims remain unaffected

Section 166c(1) excludes these claims from discharge:

  • A natural person’s claim not acquired by assignment, transfer or succession other than inheritance, where it was not lodged because the trustee failed to notify that creditor of bankruptcy in writing.
  • A claim arising from legal assistance provided to the debtor by the Legal Aid Centre.
  • A secured claim to the extent covered by the collateral’s value.
  • Liability for personal injury or intentionally caused damage.
  • A child’s maintenance claim.
  • Employment claims of the debtor’s employees.
  • A criminal fine under the Criminal Code.
  • A non-monetary claim.

Unaffected claims remain recoverable as though no discharge occurred. Conversely, certain items are unenforceable by law, including some accessory claims, contractual penalties and claims of persons related to the debtor (Section 166b).

Revocation for dishonest intent

A creditor affected by discharge may seek revocation within six years of the bankruptcy declaration or instalment plan determination by proving dishonest intent (Section 166f(1)). Section 166g gives examples, including concealed assets, an omitted creditor or deliberately caused inability to pay.

Revocation makes discharge ineffective against all creditors. Claims regain their original enforceability and maturity to the full extent still unpaid. Such claims shall not become time-barred before ten years have elapsed from revocation.

Section 166f(4) of Act No. 7/2005 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

Monitoring the debtor after discharge can therefore pay off: concealed assets may reopen the route to recovery. See lodging a bankruptcy claim and disputed claims and incidental actions for bankruptcy procedure, and bankruptcy of a company member for that specific situation.

How we can help

Our debt recovery service assesses what remains after discharge, from unaffected claims and guarantors to revocation grounds. We examine the debtor’s assets through a creditworthiness review and pursue enforceable claims through enforcement proceedings.

A discharge notice does not mean the file can simply be closed. First, have the applicable exceptions assessed.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 29 August 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. When am I entitled to damages, and what is unjust enrichment? Under the general civil-law regime in Section 420 of the Civil Code, the wrongdoer's fault is presumed and compensation covers actual loss and lost profit. Breach of a commercial obligation, however, is subject to the separate liability regime in Section 373 et seq. of the Commercial Code. Unjust enrichment is a benefit obtained without legal grounds and must be returned. Limitation depends on the regime and circumstances: civil-law rules provide a two-year subjective period and specific objective limits, while commercial claims generally have a four-year period.
  2. When and where may we contact a debtor who is a consumer? Anyone recovering a contractual claim in their own name or for a creditor must not visit a consumer or their close persons at home or work without prior express consent. Contact or harassment of any kind is prohibited on Saturdays, days of rest and, on other days, between 18:00 and 08:00 the next day. These prohibitions do not apply to the professional activities of enforcement officers, lawyers and notaries.
  3. What must a payment demand contain to avoid being an unfair practice? The demand should identify the contract, state that the consumer is in default and itemise principal and each additional amount: interest, default interest, late-payment charges, recovery costs and any other claims. It should also include its issue date, payment instructions and contact details for checking the current balance. A demand lacking these details may be assessed as an unfair commercial practice.
  4. Why should a debt acknowledgement be in a separate document? Because a court treated a form combining debt acknowledgement with other transactions, whose hidden purpose was to extend limitation, as an unfair commercial practice and the acknowledgement itself as absolutely invalid for conflict with good morals. An acknowledgement of a time-barred debt also has effect only if the debtor knew it was time-barred. The consumer must therefore receive clear information about limitation and its consequences, preferably in the same document.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.