The demand should identify the contract, state that the consumer is in default and itemise principal and each additional amount: interest, default interest, late-payment charges, recovery costs and any other claims. It should also include its issue date, payment instructions and contact details for checking the current balance. A demand lacking these details may be assessed as an unfair commercial practice.
Six required elements
According to the National Bank of Slovakia’s position, written demands or reminders lacking appropriate content may be unfair commercial practices. A demand should contain:
- Identification of the contract, such as its title, number and conclusion date.
- A statement that the consumer is in default.
- An itemised debt amount, separating principal, each accessory claim such as interest, default interest and late-payment charges, recovery costs and any other claims.
- The date on which the reminder was issued.
- Payment details for paying the overdue amount.
- Contact details through which the consumer can verify the current balance.
The reasoning mirrors misleading omission under Section 11 of Act No. 108/2024 Coll. on Consumer Protection: a commercial practice must not omit material information the average consumer needs for an informed decision. A debtor unable to identify the components of the amount or verify it lacks that basis.
Exceptions apply to demands for overdue instalments sent under separate legislation and situations where the circumstances already make the information clear to the consumer, for example where they requested a current amortisation table.
What should not appear in a demand
Additional content may also constitute an unfair practice:
- False information on sanctions that were not agreed or are not applied in practice.
- Incomplete or distorted information on how the debt will develop if the consumer does not pay the specified amount by the deadline.
- Specific amounts of future legal representation costs supposedly arising on non-payment before a court has decided the matter.
Aggressive practices include wording suggesting proceedings are already underway, that a court will unconditionally rule for the creditor, or threats of acts the creditor is not entitled to take.
State recovery costs carefully
A consumer may be required to reimburse only costs reasonably and actually incurred in asserting or recovering the claim (Section 13(3) of Act No. 108/2024 Coll.). The calculation must be provided free of charge, with an explanation of its method on request.
Costs of asserting a claim are accessory claims under Section 121(3) of the Civil Code. In practice, they are recoverable only if necessary, reasonably and actually incurred, and provable by the creditor. How they are communicated to the consumer also matters, including whether they could have arisen at all and in what amount.
One demand versus a system
One-off recovery concerns a document’s content. Portfolio recovery concerns a process: whether demands follow a reminder system documented in internal rules, properly applied, internally controlled, predictable and regularly reviewed. Demands under such a system will not be assessed as aggressive commercial practices.
Our debt recovery audit and reminder system service addresses templates and processes. See also when and where you may contact a debtor.
This answer provides general information on the law as at 9 August 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.