Legal Q&A · Compliance, Registers & Licences

When is a certified signature enough, and when do we need lawyer authorisation?

Law as at 5 September 2026

Short answer

These are different legal procedures. Official signature certification by a notary, municipality or district office confirms only that a particular person signed the document; its content is not reviewed. In authorisation, a lawyer drafts the contract, establishes the parties' identities, checks legality and bears liability for damage. The cadastre does not require certified signatures on such contracts. Since 17 August 2026, incorporation documents and business interest transfers require lawyer authorisation or a notarial deed. A qualified electronic signature with a timestamp replaces a handwritten signature and its certification, but not authorisation or a notarial deed.

You are buying an apartment, transferring a business interest or granting a power of attorney, and encounter a requirement for a “certified signature” or, for company documents since 17 August 2026, “lawyer authorisation”. These are different legal procedures with different effects. An electronic signature replaces some of them.

Signature certification confirms who signed

A notary certifies signature authenticity under Act No. 323/1992 Coll. (the Notarial Code); a municipality or district office does so under Act No. 78/2026 Coll. on the Certification of Documents and Signatures on Documents, effective from 1 September 2026. Certification confirms only that the person signed before the certifying official or acknowledged the signature as their own (Section 58(1) of the Notarial Code; Section 8(1) of Act No. 78/2026 Coll.). The content is not reviewed, as both laws expressly state: notarial signature certification does not certify the truth of the facts stated in the document (Section 58(4)), and an office or municipality does not certify its content, correctness or truth (Section 14(3) of Act No. 78/2026 Coll.). A certified signature therefore protects against a challenge to the signature, not against a bad contract.

Authorisation: the lawyer is responsible for identity and content

Authorisation is governed by Act No. 586/2003 Coll. on the Legal Profession:

Authorisation of a contract means drafting a property transfer contract, a company’s incorporation document, a business interest transfer agreement or a shareholders’ agreement under Section 220w(3) of the Commercial Code; establishing the identities of the parties and their representatives; assessing whether the contract contravenes or circumvents the law or is contrary to good morals; and assessing whether entering into the contract will give rise to circumstances causing damage.

Section 1a(1) of Act No. 586/2003 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

The lawyer bears responsibility: if they fail to establish the parties’ true identities and do not refuse the service, they cannot escape liability for damage caused by identity misuse (Section 1b(3)). We explain what to bring in documents needed for contract authorisation.

Which procedure is sufficient where

For property transfers, the Cadastral Act (Act No. 162/1995 Coll.) offers a choice:

The transferor’s signature on the contract […] must be certified under separate regulations […] This does not apply if […] the property transfer contract is drawn up as a notarial deed or authorised by a lawyer.

Section 42(3) of Act No. 162/1995 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

An ordinary sale contract requires the transferor’s certified signature. For an authorised contract, the cadastre does not require certification and decides on registration within 20 rather than 30 days, provided the contract does not conflict with cadastral records (Section 32(1) and (2)). For company documents, there has been no such choice since 17 August 2026: under the Commercial Code (Act No. 513/1991 Coll.), both a memorandum of association and a sole founder’s incorporation deed must take the form of a notarial deed or a document authorised by a lawyer (Section 57(1) and (3)); the same applies to a business interest transfer agreement (Section 115(4)). A transfer with merely certified signatures no longer satisfies the required form.

Authorisation does not replace a power of attorney: a mandate to enter into a memorandum of association requires the principal’s officially certified signature (Section 57(2)), as does a property transferor’s power of attorney (Section 42(3) of the Cadastral Act). A certified signature also remains required for a sole member’s decision on a managing director’s remuneration (Section 132(1) of the Commercial Code).

An electronic signature replaces a signature, not the required form

A qualified electronic signature (QES) is another form of signature. The Civil Code (Act No. 40/1964 Coll.) uses an older term that Act No. 272/2016 Coll. on Trust Services equates with a QES (Section 17(2)):

Certification of signature authenticity is not required for legal acts performed electronically, signed with a guaranteed electronic signature or guaranteed electronic seal and bearing a timestamp.

Section 40(5) of the Civil Code (unofficial English translation)

For electronic submissions to a public authority, a QES with a qualified electronic timestamp replaces an officially certified signature where the certificate unambiguously identifies the individual (Section 23(1)(b) of Act No. 305/2013 Coll.). A QES replaces the signature and its certification, but not lawyer authorisation or a notarial deed. Those procedures concern who drafted the document and is responsible for it.

How we can help

We authorise company documents through our lawyer contract authorisation service and property contracts through authorisation of property transfer contracts. Where authorisation is unnecessary, we assess the required form through our signature certification service; we certify documents for Czech proceedings directly.

Tell us what legal act you intend and where the document will be used. We assess the required form before drafting it.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 5 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. What do we need for a road haulage operator authorisation for vehicles over 3.5 tonnes? The district office in the regional capital grants road transport operator authorisation for ten years if the undertaking proves four requirements under Regulation (EC) No. 1071/2009: an effective and stable establishment in Slovakia, good repute of statutory representatives and the transport manager, financial standing comprising equity of at least EUR 9,000 for the first vehicle and EUR 5,000 for each additional vehicle over 3.5 tonnes, and the appointed transport manager's professional competence verified by examination. Transport to other EU countries additionally requires a Community licence and evidence of it in every vehicle.
  2. Who is a beneficial owner, and how are they identified? A beneficial owner is always an individual, never a company. In a company, this particularly includes anyone with a direct or indirect interest of at least 25% in voting rights or registered capital, the right to appoint or remove statutory or supervisory bodies, control by other means, or entitlement to at least 25% of the economic benefit. If no such individual can be identified, senior management, meaning the statutory body, is treated as the beneficial owner.
  3. What happens if we are not registered in RPVS or miss annual verification? The consequence is more than a fine. If beneficial owner verification is missing, the public-sector counterparty is not in default when it withholds performance for that reason, so it may lawfully withhold payment of your invoice. False or incomplete data can bring a company fine equal to the economic benefit obtained, or otherwise EUR 10,000–1,000,000, and EUR 10,000–100,000 for the statutory representative. The two-year re-registration ban arises in the sanction cases governed by Section 13a, not after every voluntary deletion.
  4. What must an RPVS verification document contain, and who prepares it? Only an authorised person, a lawyer, notary, bank, auditor or tax adviser, prepares the document to evidence beneficial owner identification or verification. It must explain the information supporting the conclusion, state the partner's ownership and management structure and confirm that the facts match what was actually established. It must not contain a personal identification number or another generally applicable identifier.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer