Legal Q&A · Litigation & Damages

Someone filed agreements transferring our properties with the land register, but we did not sign them. What should we do?

Law as at 16 August 2026

Short answer

Act immediately, before the district office decides on registration. Approval becomes final on the day it is issued, and the Act expressly excludes appeal, reopening and review outside appeal proceedings. While the proceedings remain pending, it is possible to secure their suspension and a notice in the register. After approval, the only remaining route is a court claim and litigation that can last years.

Cadastral departments encounter cases in which they receive a series of agreements by which an ‘owner’ transfers all their properties to non-existent companies or fictitious persons, while the true owner knows nothing about it and has signed nothing. Companies with larger property portfolios are particularly easy targets if they do not check their title deeds.

Why days matter

The Act allows no remedies against approved title registration:

A decision approving registration becomes final on the day it is issued. No appeal or application to reopen proceedings may be filed against a decision approving registration, nor may it be reviewed outside appeal proceedings.

Section 31(5) of the Cadastral Act (unofficial English translation)

This is therefore not a deadline that can be missed and later remedied, but a complete exclusion of remedies. The moment the office approves registration, the administrative proceedings are closed. Someone else is entered as owner, and your ownership can then be pursued only through a court claim, with the burden of proof on you and the risk that the property will be ‘sold’ on in the meantime.

The office may send the approval decision to the parties up to 15 days after issuing it (Section 31(6)), and under the forged agreement you probably do not even appear among the parties. In practice, you may not learn about it at all until someone calls.

What the land register checks and what it will not detect

The scope of review is set by law. The district office checks whether the agreement contains its essential particulars, whether the act is in the required form, whether the transferor may dispose of the property, whether the expressions of intent are certain and comprehensible, whether freedom of contract or the right of disposal is restricted, and whether the agreement conflicts with or circumvents the law or is contrary to good morals (Section 31(1)). It also considers factual and legal circumstances that may affect approval.

Checking the authenticity of the signature is not among these checks. The office works with a document that appears regular: it bears a certified signature, the property description matches and the fee is paid. A reasonably well-made forgery can pass this filter because it is designed to catch formal defects, rather than fraud.

If the agreement was drawn up as a notarial deed or authorised by a lawyer, the office assesses only its consistency with the cadastral records and compliance with procedural requirements (Section 31(2)). The review is therefore even narrower.

While proceedings are pending

The opportunity to respond is narrow, but it exists. Title registration proceedings are suspended, among other circumstances, if:

  • proceedings on a preliminary issue have begun (Section 31a(a)), typically court proceedings on ownership or the agreement’s validity;
  • an urgent or interim measure orders a party not to dispose of a particular property (Section 31a(e));
  • the right to dispose of the property is restricted under separate legislation (Section 31a(f)).

The most effective tool is therefore a prompt application for an urgent measure, seeking a court decision that directly requires the office to suspend the proceedings. A complaint to the office, letter or telephone call does not have the same effect.

A notice is entered in parallel. A notice records facts restricting the owner’s right to dispose of the property or provides information about the property or rights to it (Section 38). The office enters it on notification from a court or another state authority, or on an application by an entitled person or a party, and also records that the reliability of the cadastral information about the right to the property has been challenged (Section 39(1) and (2)). This alerts every subsequent prospective buyer and breaks the chain of further ‘transfers’ to third parties who might later assert good faith.

The Act also allows proceedings to be terminated on other grounds, for example if the application was not submitted by a party or defects in the application or attachments were not corrected within the set period (Section 31b(1)). Forged agreements often contain several defects. They need to be identified specifically to the office, in writing and on the file.

If registration has already been approved

The response is a claim, usually for a declaration of ownership, alongside an application for a notice to prevent the property being smoothly sold on. If it has already passed to another acquirer, a dispute over that person’s good faith is added. A criminal complaint is filed in parallel, but criminal proceedings do not themselves restore ownership: that is for the civil court to decide.

This scenario costs many times more time and money than a few days’ work at the outset.

Prevention

The land register also records circumstances relating to property rights, including a declaration of bankruptcy against the owner, commencement of proceedings to execute a judgment by selling the property, commencement of expropriation proceedings and commencement of enforcement by sale of the property (Section 6(1)(f)). A pending-entry marker also appears on the title deed very quickly; we explain it in what a pending-entry marker on a title deed means.

If a company owns several properties, regular checks of its title deeds are worthwhile. They take a few minutes a month and are the only way to learn of an unauthorised proceeding while the registration period is still running.

How we can help

If this is happening now, contact us today, rather than next week. While proceedings remain open, there are steps we can take. We prepare an application for an urgent measure and a submission to the cadastral file, arrange the notice and take over court representation, including a claim for a declaration of ownership. If proceedings have been suspended or registration refused and a deadline applies, see suspended and refused cadastral proceedings.

The first call, in which we establish the stage of the proceedings, is free.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 16 August 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. The managing director caused the company loss, but the company is not suing. Can a member bring the claim? Yes. If the company does not pursue its own claims, typically because the wrongdoer is also its managing director or has majority support, any member may bring a claim on the company's behalf under Section 122(3) of the Commercial Code. Any recovery belongs to the company, rather than the member bringing the action. That member bears the litigation costs and is entitled to reimbursement on success. The action alone does not address the director remaining in office, so it is usually combined with other steps.
  2. We signed an agreement with an arbitration clause. Can the dispute still be brought before an ordinary court? In a business-to-business relationship, lack of jurisdiction must be raised promptly during the arbitration. If the tribunal makes a preliminary ruling confirming jurisdiction, an application to the court must be filed within 30 days after delivery of that ruling; an action to set aside the award generally has a 60-day period from delivery and is limited to statutory grounds. Enforcement review is narrower and does not replace a missed objection that the arbitration agreement is invalid or non-existent. An application to stop enforcement filed within 15 days after notice has suspensive effect, but it must rely on a permissible enforcement ground.
  3. Our company did not read a judgment in its electronic mailbox. Is it still treated as served? Generally yes. A legal entity's electronic mailbox is activated for service by law, and a judgment is served personally: service occurs when the delivery receipt is confirmed or, at the latest, when the 15-day collection period expires, even if nobody opened the message. The appeal period runs from service, after which the judgment becomes final. Later remedies are narrow and require proof of objective reasons, so monitoring the mailbox is cheaper than explaining afterwards.
  4. I lent money, but the other party says it was a gift. Who has to prove what? You prove that the money actually passed from your assets to the other party; you do not have to prove the absence of a reason for them to keep it. Anyone claiming the payment was a gift must prove that the donor intended to give the money without consideration. If no gift or other legal basis is established, the payment is unjust enrichment and must be returned. Evidence of the parties' intentions therefore decides the dispute, which is why loans should be documented.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer