Legal Q&A · Company financing

I lent money to my own s. r. o. Will I get it back if the company enters a crisis or bankruptcy?

Law as at 3 October 2026

Short answer

If, as a managing director or a shareholder with an interest of at least 5 %, you lent money to the company when it was already in crisis and that crisis could have been identified, the company may not repay the loan, subject to statutory exceptions, while the crisis continues or if repayment would cause it to enter a crisis. Your claim does not cease to exist; repayment is deferred. In bankruptcy, your claim is satisfied only after other unsecured creditors’ claims, and any security for it is disregarded, regardless of when you lent the money. Subject to the statutory conditions, the insolvency trustee may challenge a loan repayment made by the company in the years preceding bankruptcy.

A company lacks the funds to pay suppliers or wages. A shareholder or managing director lends it their own money on the understanding that the company will repay them when its situation improves. A financially sound company repays the loan in accordance with the agreement. However, if a shareholder with an interest of at least 5 % or a member of management lends money to a company in crisis, the Commercial Code (Act No. 513/1991 Zb.), subject to the conditions set out below, treats the loan as financing replacing equity and prohibits its repayment during the crisis. In bankruptcy, a claim held by a managing director or a shareholder with an interest of at least 5 % is satisfied only after other unsecured creditors’ claims.

When a company is in crisis

A company is in crisis if it is insolvent or at risk of insolvency, and also if its equity-to-liabilities ratio is less than 8 to 100 (Section 67a). These rules apply to a limited liability company (s. r. o.), a joint-stock company, a simple joint-stock company and a limited partnership with no natural person as a general partner (Section 67i(1)).

A loan made during a crisis must not be repaid

The prohibition covers credit or similar financing provided to a company in crisis, as well as an earlier loan whose maturity was deferred or extended during the crisis (Section 67c(1)). The provider must be one of the persons listed in the Act, such as a managing director, a holder of procuration, a supervisory board member, a silent partner, a person holding a direct or indirect interest of at least 5 % in the registered capital or voting rights, or a person close to any of them or acting on their behalf (Section 67c(2)). The Act also requires that, at the time the financing was provided, the crisis was apparent from the latest financial statements, or would have been apparent had those statements been prepared on time, or that the provider knew or could have known about the crisis (Section 67d). Exceptions include money lent for no more than 60 days, provided that such lending is not repeated (Section 67e, letter (b)).

The following quotation is reproduced in its original language:

Plnenie nahradzujúce vlastné zdroje spolu s príslušenstvom a zmluvnou pokutou nemožno vrátiť, ak je spoločnosť v kríze, alebo ak by sa v dôsledku toho do krízy dostala. Lehoty na vrátenie plnenia nahradzujúceho vlastné zdroje počas tohto obdobia neplynú.

§ 67f ods. 1 Obchodného zákonníka

The right to repayment therefore does not cease to exist. Repayment is deferred until the crisis ends. If the company repays the loan despite the prohibition, the value of that repayment must be returned to the company, and the managing directors who held office at the time of payment are liable as guarantors for its return (Section 67f(2) and (3)). In an s. r. o., a shareholder and the other persons listed above may lend money to the company only by a non-cash payment method (Section 121(2)).

What happens to the loan in bankruptcy

In bankruptcy, the repayment claim must be lodged in the same way as any other claim (Section 67f(1) and Section 28(1) of Act No. 7/2005 Z. z.). Its ranking is determined by the Bankruptcy and Restructuring Act:

The following quotation is reproduced in its original language:

Tak isto ako podriadená pohľadávka sa uspokojí tiež zmluvná pokuta a pohľadávka, ktorá patrí alebo patrila veriteľovi, ktorý je alebo kedykoľvek od vzniku pohľadávky bol spriaznený s úpadcom […]

§ 95 ods. 3 zákona č. 7/2005 Z. z.

Subordination applies regardless of whether the company was in crisis when the loan was made. Related persons include, among others, a managing director, a holder of procuration, a supervisory board member and a person holding a direct or indirect interest of at least 5 % (Section 9(1) and (3)). Subordinated claims are satisfied only from what remains in the general bankruptcy estate after all other unsecured claims have been satisfied in full (Section 95(2)). Security for a related-party claim, such as a security interest over the company’s assets, is disregarded in bankruptcy (Section 95(3)).

If the company repaid the loan before bankruptcy

The insolvency trustee may also challenge a loan repayment already made by the company. The trustee may challenge a legal act by which the debtor unjustifiably preferred one creditor over others, even if the claim has already been satisfied (Section 59(1) and Section 57(3) of the Bankruptcy and Restructuring Act). Where the person concerned is related to the debtor, insolvency at the time of the act is presumed, and acts performed during the 3 years before the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings may also be challenged (Section 59(3) and (4)). Whether repayment of a particular loan will withstand a challenge depends on the circumstances. The article payments before bankruptcy and avoidance discusses this. In addition, a company that knows, or through the exercise of professional care could know, that it is insolvent must not pay a due claim in an amount greater than the creditor would receive in bankruptcy (Section 3(4)). Exceptions concern insolvency arising during public preventive restructuring and payments to unrelated persons that are essential to the operation of the business.

The rules on companies in crisis, including a shareholder’s guarantee for a company loan, are discussed in more detail in the article a shareholder’s loan to a company in crisis (forthcoming) (in Slovak). We explain when a shareholder is liable by law for the debts of an s. r. o. in the question shareholder liability for the debts of an s. r. o..

Through our credit and loan agreements service, we will prepare a shareholder loan agreement with repayments linked to the company’s financial position and, where appropriate, a subordination undertaking. Before signing, we will review the latest financial statements with you. If the company has a long-term capital shortfall, we will also assess an increase in registered capital.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 3 October 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. A bank sold me corporate bonds as a safe investment, and the issuer is not paying. Is the seller liable? The bank is not automatically liable merely because the issuer is not paying. The debt remains the issuer's obligation. However, the bank may be liable to you for loss if it breached its duties when selling the bond, for example by misleadingly presenting it as safe, failing to explain the risks or recommending it without assessing whether it was suitable for you. Generally, you must also prove that you would not have invested had the bank acted properly. At the same time, preserve your claim against the issuer. The Investment Guarantee Fund does not cover the issuer's failure to pay.
  2. We want to raise money through a crowdfunding platform. What must we prepare as a company, and what are we responsible for? The company needs a platform authorised under the European Crowdfunding Regulation. The platform must conduct due diligence on the company. The company prepares a key investment information sheet for each offer and is responsible for the information it contains. It must also fulfil the obligations arising from the loans, bonds or shares it offers to investors. The Regulation applies only to offers of up to EUR 5 000 000 over 12 months. A larger offer must be assessed under the prospectus rules.
  3. We are granting ownership interests, shares or options to employees of a Czech company. When will they pay tax on them? The benefit an employee receives when acquiring an ownership interest or option for less than its value is treated as employment income in Czechia. If the employer notifies the tax authority in time that it intends to use deferred taxation, the income is taxed only upon the first of the statutory events, such as termination of employment, transfer of the ownership interest or exercise of the option, and no later than 15 years after acquisition. From 1 January 2026, companies meeting the statutory requirements, particularly the turnover and asset thresholds, may also grant qualified employee options. Income from their exercise is taxed as other income only when the ownership interest is sold, and no later than 15 years after exercise. Have a tax adviser check the tax calculation.
  4. We want our bonds to be traded on a stock exchange. What requirements must we meet, and is it worthwhile? The issuer or an exchange member applies for admission of bonds to the regulated market of the Bratislava Stock Exchange. The bonds must be in book-entry form, and the issuer must have an LEI and, subject to narrow exemptions, an approved and published prospectus. A prospectus is required even where the public offer alone would not require one. The issuer then becomes subject to annual and half-yearly financial reporting requirements (unless it issues only bonds with a denomination of at least EUR 100 000), disclosure of inside information and other disclosure obligations. A less demanding route is a multilateral trading facility, whose requirements are set by its rules. Whether admission is worthwhile depends on whether you want to give investors the option of selling their bonds before maturity and whether that benefit outweighs the cost of the prospectus and ongoing obligations.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer