Legal Q&A · Property Transfer

A security right in favour of the other owners is registered over the flat. Can it be removed?

Law as at 16 August 2026

Short answer

No. This security right arises directly by law in favour of the other owners of flats and non-residential premises in the building, securing claims related to the building and the flat. It is registered in the cadastre, and the law expressly prohibits removal while the secured asset exists. It is therefore neither a defect in the flat nor evidence of the seller’s debt, but a normal feature of almost every flat’s title sheet.

A buyer obtains the title sheet, sees a security right in favour of the other flat owners among the encumbrances, and becomes alarmed. The seller says they owe nothing. Both are right, because this security did not arise from a debt.

It arises by law over every flat

To secure claims that have arisen or will arise in the future from legal acts concerning the building, its common parts, common facilities and appurtenances, and claims that have arisen or will arise in the future from legal acts concerning a flat or non-residential premises in the building carried out by their owner, a security right arises by law over the flat or non-residential premises in favour of the other owners of flats and non-residential premises.

— Section 15(1) of Act No. 182/1993 Coll., unofficial translation

It therefore also secures claims that do not yet exist. It is not tied to a particular debt, and its presence on the title sheet says nothing about whether the seller owes money.

Why it cannot be removed

The same provision continues with the answer: the security right is recorded in the cadastre and cannot be removed while the secured asset exists. The right under subsection (1) continues throughout the existence of that asset (Section 15(3)).

As long as the flat exists, the encumbrance remains. Requesting removal before a sale is pointless, and no agreement with the seller or building manager can change this. Its termination differs from ordinary contractual security, whose termination grounds are listed in Section 151md of the Civil Code.

The law also permits security over a flat in favour of a third party (Section 15(2)), typically a bank. This is a separate encumbrance with its own rules, and the two must be distinguished on the title sheet.

What should a buyer check instead?

If the statutory security right is not itself a warning, the buyer’s concern is whether there are arrears associated with the flat that could be enforced through it. That is why a flat transfer agreement must include a certificate from the manager or association chair confirming that the owner has no service charge arrears or unpaid contributions to the operation, maintenance and repair fund. The first transfer is exempt (Section 5(2)). We discuss this in the manager refuses to issue a no-arrears certificate.

Also check whether the building’s owners have decided to apply for enforcement proceedings or a voluntary auction of the flat. Such a decision requires a majority of the votes of all owners (Section 14b(1)(o)). Check too for any approved refurbishment loan that you will help repay after purchase.

When the flat goes to auction

The ranking of this security right is often disputed at auctions and determines which encumbrances are removed afterwards and which survive. We discuss the related issues in selling property subject to enforcement, which explains the distinction between first-ranking and lower-ranking secured creditors in detail.

For an auction buyer, this is crucial: the price depends on what remains attached to the flat.

How we can help

When you buy a flat, we read the title sheet and distinguish the statutory encumbrance that will always remain from actual risks through our property legal due diligence. We prepare the flat purchase agreement, request the manager’s certificate and arrange escrow where arrears exist. If the other party has supplied an agreement, we examine it through our purchase agreement review.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 16 August 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Our agreement was authorised by a lawyer. Who is liable if something goes wrong? The lawyer who drew up an authorised agreement is liable for its content. With such an agreement the district authority examines only whether it is consistent with the cadastral records and whether the procedural conditions are met, so the Act places the assessment of lawfulness and of the risk of damage on the lawyer. A lawyer is liable to the client for damage caused in the practice of law and must be insured against that risk. That liability does not, however, extend to everything that can go wrong on a transfer: if the other party fails to pay or to hand over the property, that is primarily a breach of contract by that party and is pursued against it.
  2. The buyer is taking out a mortgage and the bank wants me, as the seller, to sign the security agreement. Why, and is it safe? A bank may make drawdown of the loan conditional on security over the property being bought, yet the buyer becomes the owner only upon registration in the cadastre. A security right may be created over an asset owned by the security provider, who need not be the debtor, so the bank may ask for the seller’s signature or for an agreement over property the buyer will acquire in the future. The risk for the seller is that their property secures someone else’s loan before they have been paid. Before signing, therefore, agree when and how the security right will end if the purchase does not go ahead.
  3. I signed an agreement for a flat and the bank refused my mortgage. Do I still have to buy it? Refusal of a mortgage does not by itself cancel an agreement you have signed. You may withdraw from an agreement only where the law allows it or where you have agreed it, so what matters is whether the agreement contains a financing condition or a right to withdraw if the loan is refused. If it does not, you remain bound, and the seller may demand performance, an agreed contractual penalty or compensation for loss. The sooner you raise the situation with the seller and with other banks, the more options remain.
  4. We are buying a flat on a mortgage as an unmarried couple. How should we set it up so that both of us are protected? Unmarried partners have no undivided co-ownership, so they acquire the flat into co-ownership in shares in the proportions stated in the purchase agreement. Towards the bank, both of them are usually co-debtors jointly and severally, regardless of the share each has in the flat. Set the shares according to what each of you is putting into the flat, and agree in writing on repayment and on what happens if you separate. A co-debtor who is not registered as an owner is repaying a loan on someone else’s flat and has only monetary claims against the other, not a share in the flat.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer