Legal Q&A · Company formation in Czechia and Slovakia

Must our company's responsible representative be an employee? Slovakia compared with Czechia

Law as at 5 September 2026

Short answer

In Slovakia, generally yes: the responsible representative must have an employment relationship with the entrepreneur. For an s. r. o., the main exception is a member, who needs no employment contract while their membership continues. In Czechia, employment is unnecessary; since 2008, any contractual relationship, even unpaid, is sufficient. Watch this difference when making changes: selling an ownership interest ends the Slovak exception, and the company has fifteen days to put a new arrangement in place.

Slovakia and Czechia both started from the same federal Trade Licensing Act No. 455/1991, but it now applies in a different version in each country. The rules diverge particularly sharply for responsible representatives. A company operating on both sides of the border therefore cannot simply copy its arrangement from one country to the other.

Slovakia: employment, unless the representative is a company member

A legal entity must appoint a responsible representative if it carries on a craft or regulated trade (Section 11(6) of Act No. 455/1991 Coll.). The representative is an individual through whom the company ensures the professional performance of the activity: the company meets the professional competence requirement through that person. The Act expressly states the required relationship:

When the trade is carried on, the responsible representative must be in an employment relationship with the entrepreneur. This does not apply where, under the conditions laid down by a special Act, […] the representative is the entrepreneur’s spouse, direct-line relative or sibling, or, in the case of a legal entity, its member, or, in the case of a municipality, its mayor.

— Section 11(1) of Act No. 455/1991 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

In practice, an s. r. o. therefore has two routes: employ a professionally qualified person under an employment contract, since an agreement to perform work outside employment or a cooperation agreement with a sole trader is insufficient; or appoint a member, for whom the Act requires no additional relationship. The special Act’s conditions relate to the entrepreneur’s family members, rather than a member of the company. Further limits apply in both cases: the representative must reside in Slovakia or hold a residence permit, must not sit on the company’s supervisory board, and may perform the role at only one establishment.

The member exception lasts only while membership continues

The most common trap arises on a transfer of an ownership interest, rather than at incorporation. By selling the interest, the representative ceases to be a member, and the exception ends at the moment of transfer. Within 15 days, the company must notify the trade licensing office of termination of the role and appoint a new representative, or enter into an employment contract with the existing one (Section 11(9) and (10)). The ownership interest transfer agreement should therefore expressly flag this duty; otherwise, it may be discovered only during an inspection.

A second distinction matters: the exception addresses the Trade Licensing Act, rather than the work itself. Performing the representative’s role, providing professional assurance and supervision, will generally not satisfy the characteristics of dependent work. But if the member also actually performs dependent work for the company under instructions and at specified times, this is assessed separately under the rules on illegal work. The family assistance regime is narrowly defined and does not cover company members (Section 2a(2) of Act No. 82/2005 Coll.). We discuss this in detail in family assistance without an employment contract.

Czechia: a contractual relationship is sufficient

Under Czech law, the responsible representative need only have a contractual relationship with the entrepreneur. The requirement for an employment-law relationship was removed by an amendment effective from 2008. A mandate or another agreement, even an unpaid one, suffices. Instead of the Slovak limit of one establishment, no person may perform the role for more than four entrepreneurs. A member of a legal entity’s supervisory body is excluded, as in Slovakia. For a concession-based trade, appointment of the representative requires approval from the trade licensing office.

The representative’s responsibility and when the office intervenes

The representative is responsible for the professional aspect of operations; they are not the statutory body and do not act on the company’s behalf. Penalties primarily target the company. Failure to appoint a representative where required can result in a fine of up to EUR 1,659 (Section 65a(1) of Act No. 455/1991 Coll.); failure to notify appointment or termination can result in a fine of up to EUR 663 (Section 65a(2)). For a serious breach of conditions, the office may suspend or revoke authorisation (Section 58(2)). When a company needs a representative and how it obtains trade authorisation are discussed in trade authorisation arises on entry in the Commercial Register and notifying a regulated trade for an s. r. o..

How we can help

When a company is formed, we set up its business activities and responsible representative to match its planned operations through forming an s. r. o. in Slovakia or forming an s. r. o. in Czechia. We prepare the representative’s employment contract, consents and notifications to the authorities through corporate documentation for an s. r. o..

If you plan to transfer an interest in a company whose representative is a member, contact us before signing: fifteen days after the transfer is often too late.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 5 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. A co-founder programmed a prototype before the company was formed. Who owns the code and how do we get it into the company? The code belongs to the founder as its author, not to the company, unless they wrote it in the course of work for another employer or client. The rule on employee works does not apply as against the company, because the company did not exist when the code was created and the founder had no employment relationship or office with it. The company may use the code only with the author's consent, and therefore needs a written licence agreement: exclusive, covering every necessary manner of use including modifications, and with consent to sub-licences and assignment of the licence given in advance.
  2. My fellow member reserved the business name in their own name. May we register our s.r.o. under it? Yes, if you prove entitlement to use the reserved name when filing the registration application. Identity with a name reserved under Section 51(2) of Act No. 29/2026 Coll. is not an obstacle to registration where the applicant (for an s.r.o., all the managing directors) proves such entitlement. The provision does not specify by what document; in practice, written consent from the party that reserved the name, given for the specific company, is the way to do it. Without entitlement the name remains blocked until the reservation lapses.
  3. When should we reserve a business name so that 60 days are enough to form an s.r.o.? Only once your founding documents are all but ready. A reservation ends when the name is entered, and in any event 60 days after delivery of the confirmation; the Act makes no provision for extending it. Signing the memorandum of association in the required form, filing the application and the registration itself, including any objections, must all fit within that window. The longer statutory period for filing the application does not extend the reservation.
  4. Must a memorandum of association now take the form of a notarial deed, or is lawyer authorisation sufficient? A lawyer is sufficient. Since 17 August 2026, incorporation documents must take the form of a notarial deed recording a legal act or a document authorised by a lawyer; both forms are legally equivalent. The lawyer drafts the agreement, verifies the founders' identities, authorises it and deposits it in the central authorisation register. A notary who drafted the document may not register the same matter themselves. An exception applies to an s. r. o. formed under the simplified procedure using the state electronic form.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer