Legal Q&A · Litigation & Damages

The debtor paid only after we filed a claim. Can we withdraw it without losing our costs?

Law as at 5 September 2026

Short answer

Yes, if you explain the withdrawal properly and provide evidence of payment. Payment after filing means the defendant procedurally caused the discontinuance, and the court then awards costs to you. If you withdraw without explanation, you risk the court attributing procedural responsibility to you and awarding costs to the defendant. The contents of the submission are therefore decisive, rather than the act of withdrawal alone.

You filed a claim and paid the court fee and your lawyer, and shortly after the claim was served the debtor paid. Continuing the proceedings makes no sense, but you do not want to bear the costs of bringing the claim. The procedural rules address exactly this situation, but it must be presented to the court correctly.

A claim can be withdrawn and the court will discontinue proceedings

The Code of Civil Dispute Procedure (Act No. 160/2015 Coll.) allows a claimant to withdraw a claim (Section 144). On a complete withdrawal, the court discontinues the proceedings (Section 145(1)). The defendant may object, but that objection carries weight only at later stages:

The court shall not discontinue proceedings if the defendant objects to withdrawal of the claim for serious reasons. The defendant’s objection is disregarded if the claim is withdrawn before the preliminary consideration of the dispute […] or the hearing has begun.

Section 146(1) of the Code of Civil Dispute Procedure (unofficial English translation)

If the debtor paid only the principal and still owes interest or part of the sum, do not withdraw the entire claim. On partial withdrawal, the court discontinues only the paid portion and continues with the balance (Section 145(2)).

Procedural responsibility determines costs

If a party has procedurally caused the discontinuance of proceedings, the court shall award reimbursement of litigation costs to the opposing party.

Section 256(1) of the Code of Civil Dispute Procedure (unofficial English translation)

On withdrawal, the court examines whose conduct caused discontinuance. If the claim was justified when filed and the defendant performed only afterwards, the defendant bears procedural responsibility: withdrawal is merely the consequence of late payment. Reimbursement of litigation costs, including the court fee and legal representation costs, then belongs to you. The converse also applies: withdrawal without reasons, or withdrawal of an unjustified claim, is treated as the claimant’s responsibility and costs are awarded to the defendant.

Explain and evidence the withdrawal

State expressly that you are withdrawing precisely because the defendant paid the claimed sum after the claim was filed. Attach dated proof of payment, usually a bank statement. What matters is that performance occurred after filing, so evidence both dates and expressly request costs under Section 256(1). The court may exceptionally decline to award costs for reasons deserving special consideration (Section 257 of the Code of Civil Dispute Procedure). This is another reason for the withdrawal to make clear that the debtor, rather than you, caused both the dispute and its end.

If the debtor has not paid everything, consider before withdrawal whether the remaining claim is at risk of becoming time-barred. We discuss the connection in when a claim becomes time-barred.

How we can help

We prepare a properly reasoned withdrawal and request for costs through court representation. In debt recovery, we monitor payments throughout the proceedings so that partial payments receive a timely and procedurally appropriate response. If litigation is only a possibility, a professionally prepared letter before action often prompts payment before any court fee is paid.

If the debtor paid after you filed the claim, do not rush into a one-sentence withdrawal. Send it to us for preparation before the court decides.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 5 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. The managing director caused the company loss, but the company is not suing. Can a member bring the claim? Yes. If the company does not pursue its own claims, typically because the wrongdoer is also its managing director or has majority support, any member may bring a claim on the company's behalf under Section 122(3) of the Commercial Code. Any recovery belongs to the company, rather than the member bringing the action. That member bears the litigation costs and is entitled to reimbursement on success. The action alone does not address the director remaining in office, so it is usually combined with other steps.
  2. We signed an agreement with an arbitration clause. Can the dispute still be brought before an ordinary court? In a business-to-business relationship, lack of jurisdiction must be raised promptly during the arbitration. If the tribunal makes a preliminary ruling confirming jurisdiction, an application to the court must be filed within 30 days after delivery of that ruling; an action to set aside the award generally has a 60-day period from delivery and is limited to statutory grounds. Enforcement review is narrower and does not replace a missed objection that the arbitration agreement is invalid or non-existent. An application to stop enforcement filed within 15 days after notice has suspensive effect, but it must rely on a permissible enforcement ground.
  3. Our company did not read a judgment in its electronic mailbox. Is it still treated as served? Generally yes. A legal entity's electronic mailbox is activated for service by law, and a judgment is served personally: service occurs when the delivery receipt is confirmed or, at the latest, when the 15-day collection period expires, even if nobody opened the message. The appeal period runs from service, after which the judgment becomes final. Later remedies are narrow and require proof of objective reasons, so monitoring the mailbox is cheaper than explaining afterwards.
  4. I lent money, but the other party says it was a gift. Who has to prove what? You prove that the money actually passed from your assets to the other party; you do not have to prove the absence of a reason for them to keep it. Anyone claiming the payment was a gift must prove that the donor intended to give the money without consideration. If no gift or other legal basis is established, the payment is unjust enrichment and must be returned. Evidence of the parties' intentions therefore decides the dispute, which is why loans should be documented.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer