Legal Q&A · Commercial Contracts

An invention in a joint project was created by our employee. What must we do for it to belong to the company?

Law as at 12 September 2026

Short answer

The right to a solution created by an employee in the performance of employment duties belongs to the employer, unless otherwise agreed, but the company must assert it in time. The employee must notify you of the invention in writing, and you then have three months to assert the right in writing or file an application; otherwise the right passes to the employee. An employee whose invention is claimed is entitled to reasonable remuneration.

In an agreement on joint research and development, a company usually promises to contribute results created by its own people to the project or to license them to its partners. It can keep that promise only if it actually holds the rights to those results. With inventions this is not automatic: the statute does allocate the right to the solution to the employer, but the employer must assert it in time.

The right belongs to the company if it asserts it

The starting point is Section 11(1) of Act No. 435/2001 Coll.: where an inventor creates an invention in the performance of duties under an employment relationship, a similar working relationship or a membership relationship, the right to the solution belongs to the employer, unless otherwise agreed. The employee remains the inventor and must notify you of the invention in writing without delay and hand over the materials needed to assess it (Section 11(2)).

A period then starts running for the company from the notification. It may assert the right to the solution in writing within three months; filing an application naming the employee as the inventor also counts as an assertion (Section 11(3)). If you do not use that period, the consequence is severe:

If the employer fails to assert the right to the solution within the period under paragraph 3 in the manner under paragraph 3, or notifies the inventor in writing within that period that it is not asserting the right to the solution, that right passes to the inventor.

— Section 11(4) of Act No. 435/2001 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

Until the right is asserted or the period expires, both the company and the employee must keep the invention confidential as against third parties (Section 11(5)). In a joint project this means that the invention cannot be presented prematurely to partners outside the confidentiality regime established by the cooperation agreement.

The employee’s remuneration

If you assert the right, the employee is entitled to reasonable remuneration. Its amount depends on the technical and economic significance of the invention and on the benefit of its exploitation; account is also taken of the contribution made by the company to its creation and of the employee’s work duties. The remuneration is payable within one month of the assertion (Section 11(6)). If later exploitation brings in more than corresponds to the remuneration paid, or if the remuneration was set as a lump sum without regard to those criteria, the employee may seek additional settlement after three years from the assertion (Section 11(7)). These rights survive the end of the employment relationship (Section 11(8)). If the project partners are also to bear the cost of the remuneration, the cooperation agreement must say so expressly.

Who is not an employee

The rule applies only to employees and persons in a similar or membership relationship. If a sole trader, a consultant or an employee of an external company works on the project, the right to the solution belongs to the inventor or, as the case may be, to that person’s own employer, and your company acquires it only under an assignment agreement, which must be in writing, failing which it is invalid (Section 12(3)). Since 1 September 2026, a special rule has applied to employees of public universities and the Slovak Academy of Sciences, to whom the invention belongs unless otherwise agreed; the details are set out in our article on who owns inventions made by university researchers from September 2026.

The mechanism in Czechia is similar. The right to a patent for an employee’s invention passes to the employer unless the contract provides otherwise, and if the employer does not assert it within three months of being notified, it passes back to the inventor (Section 9 of Act No. 527/1990 Sb.).

What to put in place within the company

Establish an internal procedure setting out who receives notifications of inventions, who decides on assertion within three months and how remuneration is determined. Add provisions on the results of creative activity to the employment contracts of researchers and to contracts with external contributors. Only then can you promise project partners with confidence that you will contribute the results. We prepare the cooperation agreement and the related documents for your own people under our research and development cooperation agreement service. How rights are divided where an invention is created jointly with a partner is discussed in our answer on what each co-owner of a patent may do.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 12 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Our commercial agency agreement has ended. Is the agent still entitled to commission on later transactions? Possibly. The Commercial Code grants commission after termination where a transaction results mainly from the agent's activity and takes place within a reasonable period, or where the third party's order arrived before termination. This rule can be varied or excluded by agreement. Alongside it, however, the indemnity under Section 669 is mandatory and cannot be waived in advance. The agent must assert that right within one year of termination.
  2. As a self-employed contractor, I signed a three-year non-compete. Is it enforceable? A three-year clause carries a serious risk of invalidity, but the outcome depends on the true nature of the cooperation, the restriction's scope and its proportionality. The two-year limit in Section 672a applies directly to commercial agency; courts have applied its criteria by analogy to other agreements in particular cases. It is therefore unsafe to claim that every three-year non-compete imposed on every self-employed contractor is automatically invalid. The securing penalty and whether the cooperation was actually dependent work must also be examined.
  3. The other party wants an ‘irrevocable’ power of attorney as security for the deal. Can we give one? You can grant it, but the ‘irrevocable’ element will not work: a principal cannot validly waive the right to revoke authority at any time. A power of attorney is therefore not a security instrument, and a structure allowing the other party to transfer your assets to itself on default also comes dangerously close to prohibited appropriation of collateral. Protect the transaction through escrow, a pledge or conditions in the agreement itself.
  4. My company is buying from a private individual. Does consumer law protect the seller against me? Merely designating a private individual as the seller does not exclude consumer protection. The general definition in Section 52 of the Civil Code asks whether the trader acts in the course of business and the individual outside it; status is not determined solely by who pays the price. Specific rules on consumer sales, withdrawal rights or information duties may, however, have a narrower scope. Each agreement and each rule must therefore be assessed separately when purchasing from individuals, without assuming either full protection or its complete exclusion.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer