Legal Q&A · Debt Recovery

Our debtor traded as a sole trader and has since cancelled the trade licence. Can the debt still be recovered?

Law as at 12 September 2026

Short answer

Yes. A sole trader is a natural person and business debts are that person’s own, so they do not cease to exist when the trade licence is cancelled. The commercial character of the obligation is assessed according to the nature of the parties when it arose, so the four-year limitation period under the Commercial Code also remains. Once an enforceable title has been obtained, enforcement may reach salary and bank accounts and, where the debt arose during the marriage, also assets in the community property of spouses.

You issued an invoice to a sole trader who carried out a subcontract for you or bought goods from you. After a time they stopped replying and the trade register shows that the trade licence has been cancelled. A creditor may gain the impression that the debt ceased to exist along with the business. A sole trader is, however, a natural person, not a company that ceases to exist on deletion from the register, and business debts are that person’s own obligations. Cancellation of the trade authorisation ends the right to carry on business; it does not extinguish the debts already incurred.

The commercial regime and the limitation period remain

The Commercial Code governs obligations between entrepreneurs where, at the time they arise, it is clear that they relate to their business activity (Section 261(1)). A later change in the debtor’s status is irrelevant:

In applying this Part of the Act under paragraphs 1 and 2, the nature of the parties at the time the obligation arose is decisive.

— Section 261(8) of the Commercial Code (unofficial English translation)

If you concluded the contract with them as an entrepreneur in the course of their business, the obligation continues to be governed by the Commercial Code, including the four-year limitation period (Section 397), default interest at the commercial rate and the fixed sum compensation for recovery costs. How the limitation period is calculated is explained in the question on when a receivable becomes time-barred.

Where to serve and how to sue

After the trade licence has been cancelled, the place of business tends to be out of date, so the debtor is identified by given name, surname, address of permanent residence and date of birth. The Act on the order for payment procedure permits a birth number or a company identification number instead of the date of birth, and the address of the place of business instead of permanent residence (Section 4(2) of Act No. 307/2016 Coll.); with a former sole trader, however, the address of permanent residence is the safer choice. The order for payment is served into the addressee’s own hands and, if the consignment is returned as undelivered, the court itself looks for another address in the registers available to it (Section 9(3) and (4)). If the debtor lodges an objection stating substantive reasons, the proceedings continue before the competent court, provided the claimant so requests within 15 days of the court’s invitation (Section 14(1)).

Enforcement: salary, accounts and spouses’ assets

If the former sole trader has taken up employment, enforcement may reach their income. In the schedule of the obligor’s assets the enforcement officer also ascertains the payer of salary and bank accounts (Section 39(2)(a) and (b) of the Enforcement Code), so enforcement by deductions from salary and by attachment of a claim from an account tends to be more realistic with a natural person than with a company that has ceased to exist. If the debtor is married, a debt that arose during the marriage may also be satisfied from the community property of spouses:

A claim of a creditor of only one of the spouses which arose during the marriage may, in the enforcement of a decision, also be satisfied from assets forming part of the community property of spouses.

— Section 147(1) of the Civil Code (unofficial English translation)

An exception applies where the spouses have narrowed the extent of the community property by agreement and the claim arose in connection with the use of assets not forming part of it (Section 147(2)). Where enforcement reaches assets in the community property, the obligor’s spouse is a party to the enforcement proceedings (Section 35(2) of the Enforcement Code).

Points to watch

Before filing, check the central register of enforcement proceedings to see whether other enforcements are already pending against the debtor, and the insolvency register, in which documents in debt discharge proceedings are published (Section 199(1) of Act No. 7/2005 Coll.), to see whether such proceedings are pending against them. After a discharge of debts the receivable against them may become unenforceable; what then remains open to the creditor is discussed in the question on a debtor who has gone through personal bankruptcy. If enforcement is already running against the debtor, each further matter is assigned to the same enforcement officer (Section 55(4) of the Enforcement Code), who already knows the debtor’s assets.

We will review a receivable against a former sole trader and pursue it through a demand letter, an order for payment and an enforceable title under debt recovery in Slovakia. If you already hold a title, we will prepare an application for enforcement under enforcement proceedings. Simply send the invoices, proof of delivery and whatever details of the debtor you have.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 12 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. We have a Slovak judgment against a Polish company. How do we enforce it in Poland? A judgment of a Slovak court in a commercial matter is enforceable in Poland without any declaration of enforceability. You obtain from the Slovak court a certificate under Article 53 of the Brussels Ia Regulation and produce it, together with the judgment, to the Polish enforcement authority. The debtor may request a translation of the judgment into Polish and until then enforcement is limited to protective measures, so it is sensible to have the translation ready in advance. Enforcement may be refused only on narrowly defined grounds, not because the debtor disagrees with the judgment.
  2. An invoice between a Slovak and a Czech company is overdue. What default interest and what compensation for costs can we claim? The rate of default interest and the compensation for costs are determined by the law governing the contract, not by the debtor’s state or the court in which the claim is brought. Under Slovak law, between entrepreneurs, interest accrues at the ECB base rate increased by eight percentage points, together with fixed sum compensation of EUR 40. Under Czech law it is the Czech National Bank repo rate increased by eight percentage points, together with costs associated with asserting each claim of at least CZK 1 200. In the absence of a choice of law, the contract is as a rule governed by the law of the supplier’s state.
  3. Our Czech customer promises to pay and is proposing instalments. How do we make sure our claim does not become time-barred in the meantime? Have the customer sign a written acknowledgement of debt as to its ground and amount, with an instalment schedule providing for an agreed loss of the benefit of instalments. On a sale of goods between a Slovak and a Czech company, a new four-year period will then start to run under the Limitation Convention; where the obligation is governed by Czech law, an acknowledged debt becomes time-barred ten years after the acknowledgement. Negotiating instalments does not in itself stop time running, unless there is an express agreement on out-of-court negotiations under Czech law.
  4. A Czech or Slovak customer refuses to pay, claiming the goods were defective. When does such a defence fail? A sale of goods between a company in Slovakia and one in Czechia is as a rule governed by the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. The buyer must examine the goods within as short a period as is practicable and give notice specifying the nature of the defects within a reasonable time, and at the latest within two years of handing over, failing which the right is lost; a narrow exception applies only to a buyer with a reasonable excuse for failing to give notice. Even a defect notified in time does not automatically justify withholding the entire price: the buyer may in particular reduce the price proportionately or claim damages, and may avoid the contract only for a fundamental breach.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer