Legal Q&A · Commercial Contracts

Our agreement is in Slovak and English. Which version applies if the texts differ?

Law as at 10 September 2026

Short answer

It is advisable to designate the prevailing text expressly, but statutory rules and the dispute forum must always be considered. Under Section 8(5) of the State Language Act, the state-language version of an agreement applies in the event of ambiguity or inconsistency in proceedings before the authorities and legal entities specified in Section 3(1). Outside this specific rule, the agreement's meaning is assessed under the governing law and applicable interpretation rules; expert examination of the translation is not automatically required.

The investor wants an English text; the business needs a Slovak one. Two columns side by side appear to provide double certainty. Yet when the versions differ even in one term, a question nobody asked at signing arises: which text is actually the agreement?

The prevailing text and statutory rules

Under Section 8(5) of Act No. 270/1995 Coll. on the State Language, an agreement in another official EU language is recognised alongside the state-language version in proceedings before the authorities and legal entities specified in Section 3(1), but the state-language version applies in the event of ambiguity or inconsistency. It is therefore incorrect to claim generally that both versions always have equal standing.

When interpreting a commercial agreement, the parties’ intention known, or necessarily known, to the other party and the meaning customary in commercial dealings also apply (Section 266 of the Commercial Code, Act No. 513/1991 Coll.). The Act adds a rule every drafter should know:

An expression of intent containing a term capable of different interpretations must, in case of doubt, be interpreted against the party that first used the term in the dealings.

— Section 266(4) of the Commercial Code (unofficial English translation)

Ambiguity may therefore be construed against the party that first used the disputed term. The court interprets the agreement’s legal meaning; a translation or expert evidence may be needed where appropriate. Expert examination of the translation is not a mandatory part of every dispute.

The prevailing-language clause

A clause may state that the agreement is made in Slovak and English and that a specified version prevails in case of inconsistency. It must, however, respect the statutory rule described above and fit the rest of the agreement. Choosing an English version, foreign governing law and a foreign arbitral tribunal forms a consistent whole. By contrast, an English prevailing version before a Slovak court still requires translation: the court works in the state language and in practice requests an official translation of foreign-language documents. With Slovak governing law and a Slovak court, we therefore recommend giving priority to Slovak; this is how we structure bilingual transaction documents in our practice.

The same rule should also be agreed for amendments, schedules and notices between the parties. An inconsistency can arise even in an email implementing the agreement.

Translation is substantive work

Most discrepancies result from translations prepared under time pressure at the end of a transaction, rather than bad intent. Legal concepts in two languages do not align perfectly, and a literal translation can shift the meaning of an entire clause. Translation should therefore be handled by a lawyer familiar with the contract type in both languages, and the final texts should be read side by side before signing. Bear in mind that Slovak authorities and registers work with Slovak texts; in practice, foreign-language documents are submitted with translations.

How we can help

We prepare bilingual agreements with coordinated prevailing-language, governing-law and forum clauses, draft bespoke commercial agreements in both languages from the outset, and prepare bilingual documents for investor entry. Having someone else’s translation checked before signing is cheaper than expert evidence afterwards.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 10 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Our salesperson signed a contract on terms our internal template does not permit. Is the company bound? Generally yes. A person entrusted with a particular activity in the operation of a business is authorised to carry out all the acts that ordinarily occur in it. Where they exceed that authorisation, the company is not bound only if the partner knew or could have known of the excess. An internal instruction to sign only the approved template therefore protects the company externally only where the partner is aware of it.
  2. May our commercial agent also represent a competitor during the term of our agreement? If you have agreed neither exclusivity nor any other prohibition, then generally yes. Under a non-exclusive agency the Commercial Code allows the agent to carry on the same activity for other persons; under an exclusive agency they may not do so within the agreed scope, and a breach entitles you to withdraw from the contract. Even a non-exclusive agent, however, is bound to have regard to your interests and not to misuse the information obtained from you.
  3. We want to end a mandate contract. When does the notice take effect and what must we pay the mandatary? As the mandator you may terminate a mandate contract under the Commercial Code at any time, in whole or in part; unless the notice specifies a later date, it takes effect on the day the mandatary learned or could have learned of it. The mandatary is, however, entitled to reimbursement of necessary and purposefully incurred costs and to a proportionate part of the remuneration for the activity properly carried out until the notice takes effect. The mandatary may also terminate, but their notice takes effect only at the end of the calendar month following the month in which it was delivered to you.
  4. We gave goods to a commission agent to sell. Who owns them until they are sold, and what if the buyer does not pay? The goods remain yours until a buyer acquires them; the commission agent does not become their owner. The agent, however, concludes the contract with the buyer in their own name, so you generally have no direct rights against the buyer, and an unpaid price must be enforced by the agent for your account or the claim assigned to you with your consent. The agent guarantees payment by the buyer only where they have undertaken this in writing or have breached your instructions as to whom to contract with.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer