Legal Q&A · Debt Recovery

Which court do we apply to for a European order for payment, and how much is the court fee?

Law as at 12 September 2026

Short answer

A European order for payment is issued by the court of the state having jurisdiction under the Brussels Ia Regulation: as a rule the state of the debtor’s seat, for supplies of goods or services also the state of the place of delivery, and where agreed in writing, the chosen court. Against a consumer, only the courts of the state of the consumer’s domicile have jurisdiction. In Slovakia the application is dealt with by a district court and the fee is the same as for an action, while in Czechia it is CZK 1 000 up to CZK 20 000 and 5 % above that amount. If the debtor lodges a statement of opposition, the total fees must not exceed those for ordinary proceedings.

A Slovak company supplied machinery to a customer in Austria, the invoice is overdue and the customer does not dispute it but simply does not pay. A European order for payment is well suited to such a claim, but the first question is which court to apply to. Regulation (EC) No. 1896/2006 contains its own rule on jurisdiction only for consumers; otherwise it refers to the general rules of Union law. The second question is the fee, which is governed by the law of the state in which you lodge the application.

The state in which the application is lodged

For the purposes of applying this Regulation, jurisdiction shall be determined in accordance with the relevant rules of Community law, in particular Regulation (EC) No 44/2001.

— Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No. 1896/2006

Regulation No. 44/2001 has since been replaced by the Brussels Ia Regulation (No. 1215/2012) and references to the old regulation are read as references to the new one (Article 80). Under it you generally have three options. The debtor may be sued in the state of its seat (Article 4(1)), unless you have agreed exclusively on another court. In a sale of goods you may also sue in the state to which the goods were, or should have been, delivered under the contract, and in the case of services where they were, or should have been, provided (Article 7(1)(b)). If you agreed on a court in writing in the contract, that agreement applies (Article 25(1)). A Slovak supplier therefore cannot choose a Slovak court merely because it is established there. It will, however, be assisted by delivery in Slovakia, for instance where the customer collects the goods at its warehouse under the contract, or by a jurisdiction clause in terms and conditions accepted by the customer in writing.

If the debtor is a consumer and the claim arises from a consumer contract, only the courts of the state in which the consumer is domiciled have jurisdiction (Article 6(2)). An e-shop selling into Hungary therefore applies in Hungary.

The cross-border character is assessed as at the date the application is lodged: at least one party must be domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State other than that of the court (Article 3(1) and (3)). Jurisdiction must be substantiated in the form (Article 7(2)(f)), which is therefore completed having regard to the contract and the delivery terms.

Which court in Slovakia and in Czechia

In Slovakia a district court decides at first instance (Section 12(1) of the Civil Dispute Procedure Code) and both the application and any statement of opposition are lodged in Slovak:

An application for a European order for payment and a statement of opposition to it shall be lodged in the official language.

— Section 270 of Act No. 160/2015 Coll. (unofficial English translation)

Following a timely statement of opposition, a hearing is listed by the same court that issued the order, unless you have requested that the proceedings be terminated (Section 271). In Czechia the district courts decide at first instance (Section 9(1) of Act No. 99/1963 Coll.); according to the information provided by Czechia on the European e-Justice Portal, local jurisdiction for the European order is as a rule determined by the defendant’s seat.

How much is payable

In Slovakia the fee for an application for a European order for payment is payable under item 1(a) of the schedule, that is, as a percentage of the amount claimed, in the same way as for an action for payment; note 5 to that item says so expressly. The minimum fee is EUR 25 and the maximum EUR 25 000, or EUR 50 000 in commercial matters. The half rate under Section 11c of Act No. 71/1992 Coll. applies only to the order for payment procedure under Act No. 307/2016 Coll., not to the European order.

In Czechia, according to the information on the European e-Justice Portal, the general fee is payable as for any application to commence proceedings for a monetary payment: up to CZK 20 000 it is CZK 1 000, and above that amount up to CZK 40 000 000 it is 5 % of the sum claimed.

If the debtor lodges a statement of opposition and the matter proceeds to ordinary proceedings, the combined fees for the European order and the subsequent proceedings must not exceed the fees for those proceedings without a preceding European order (Article 25(1) of the Regulation as amended by Regulation (EU) 2015/2421). Add to the fee the cost of translations and of service abroad.

What to do about it

Before applying, go through the contract, the terms and conditions and the delivery notes: they decide whether a court in your state may issue the order, or whether the proceedings will be conducted in the debtor’s state. How to complete the form itself is discussed in the question on the European order for payment and Form A. We handle the choice of court, the preparation of the application and the monitoring of time limits under the European order for payment service.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 12 September 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. Our Czech customer promises to pay and is proposing instalments. How do we make sure our claim does not become time-barred in the meantime? Have the customer sign a written acknowledgement of debt as to its ground and amount, with an instalment schedule providing for an agreed loss of the benefit of instalments. On a sale of goods between a Slovak and a Czech company, a new four-year period will then start to run under the Limitation Convention; where the obligation is governed by Czech law, an acknowledged debt becomes time-barred ten years after the acknowledgement. Negotiating instalments does not in itself stop time running, unless there is an express agreement on out-of-court negotiations under Czech law.
  2. A Czech or Slovak customer refuses to pay, claiming the goods were defective. When does such a defence fail? A sale of goods between a company in Slovakia and one in Czechia is as a rule governed by the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. The buyer must examine the goods within as short a period as is practicable and give notice specifying the nature of the defects within a reasonable time, and at the latest within two years of handing over, failing which the right is lost; a narrow exception applies only to a buyer with a reasonable excuse for failing to give notice. Even a defect notified in time does not automatically justify withholding the entire price: the buyer may in particular reduce the price proportionately or claim damages, and may avoid the contract only for a fundamental breach.
  3. Our debtor traded as a sole trader and has since cancelled the trade licence. Can the debt still be recovered? Yes. A sole trader is a natural person and business debts are that person’s own, so they do not cease to exist when the trade licence is cancelled. The commercial character of the obligation is assessed according to the nature of the parties when it arose, so the four-year limitation period under the Commercial Code also remains. Once an enforceable title has been obtained, enforcement may reach salary and bank accounts and, where the debt arose during the marriage, also assets in the community property of spouses.
  4. The debtor has sent only part of the debt. What will its payment be allocated to? What matters first is whether the debtor specified what the payment was for. If not, then between businesses the Commercial Code allocates the payment first to interest and only then to the principal, whereas the Civil Code does the opposite and starts with the principal. With several invoices, under the Commercial Code the payment goes first to the one that is least secured and only then to the one that fell due first; where the contract is governed by Czech law, priority goes to the invoice for which you have already sent the debtor a reminder. It is therefore worth agreeing the order in writing in the instalment schedule.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer