Legal Q&A · Debt Recovery

Our customer has failed to pay for a long time. Can we file a bankruptcy petition against them to make them finally pay?

Law as at 3 October 2026

Short answer

You can file a petition if the debtor is insolvent and you can substantiate the statutory requirements. In Slovakia, you generally need to substantiate your claim with a document specified by law, identify another creditor and make an advance payment before filing. In Czechia, you must pay a deposit towards the costs of the proceedings when filing the petition. A petition is not a means of recovering a single invoice from a solvent customer. If the debtor establishes that they are solvent, the petitioner risks liability for damages; in Czechia, this also applies where the petition is rejected through the petitioner’s fault, and a manifestly unfounded petition may also result in a fine.

A customer has not paid for months, ignores demands for payment, and the creditor is considering a bankruptcy petition. However, the law makes a creditor’s petition conditional on the debtor’s insolvency, rather than merely an unpaid invoice. The petitioner must substantiate the requirements with documents, pay an advance or deposit and, if the petition fails, bear the risk of liability for damages. Slovak and Czech rules differ in significant respects.

What a creditor must substantiate in Slovakia

A creditor may file a petition only against a legal entity or an individual carrying on business (Section 11(1) of Act No. 7/2005 Z. z. on Bankruptcy and Restructuring). The creditor must have reasonable grounds to presume that the debtor is unable to pay their debts:

The following quotation is reproduced in its original language:

[…] Platobnú neschopnosť dlžníka možno odôvodnene predpokladať vtedy, ak je dlžník viac ako 90 dní v omeškaní s plnením aspoň dvoch peňažných záväzkov viac ako jednému veriteľovi a bol jedným z týchto veriteľov písomne vyzvaný na zaplatenie.

§ 11 ods. 3 zákona č. 7/2005 Z. z.

The petition must state the facts supporting a presumption that the debtor is unable to pay their debts and identify both the petitioner’s own claim and another creditor with a claim, both 90 days overdue. An ordinary trade creditor must substantiate their claim with one of the following documents (Section 12(2), letters a) to c)):

  • a written acknowledgment by the debtor bearing the debtor’s officially certified signature,
  • an enforceable decision or another instrument on the basis of which enforcement may be carried out,
  • where the debtor is a legal entity, confirmation from an auditor, insolvency administrator or court expert that you record the claim in accordance with accounting regulations.

An invoice or an acknowledgment without a certified signature is therefore not sufficient on its own. An exception applies where the debtor is presumed insolvent because a notice under special legislation has been published in the Commercial Bulletin, for example a notice terminating enforcement against a legal entity for lack of assets. In that case, the creditor need not provide these documents or identify another creditor (Section 11(3) and Section 12(3)). Before filing the petition, an advance towards the provisional insolvency administrator’s remuneration and expenses must be paid into the court’s account (Section 13(1)).

What happens after a petition is filed in Slovakia

Once bankruptcy proceedings commence, the debtor must restrict their actions to ordinary legal transactions, and enforcement proceedings against their assets are stayed (Section 14(5)). The court then calls on the debtor to establish their ability to pay and, if they fail to do so, declares bankruptcy (Section 19(1)). If, before bankruptcy is declared, the debtor proves that all due claims held by creditors who are parties to the proceedings have been extinguished, the court discontinues the proceedings (Section 17(1)).

If the court discontinues the proceedings because the debtor has established their ability to pay, the creditor is liable to the debtor and other persons for damage caused by the effects of commencing the proceedings, unless the creditor proves that they acted with professional care. The member of the statutory governing body who decided to file the petition is liable on the same basis (Section 11(4)). If the debtor’s assets are insufficient even to cover the costs of bankruptcy, the court discontinues the proceedings unless a party pays an advance towards those costs (Section 20(1) and (2)). Once bankruptcy has been declared, the claim must be lodged by filing a proof of claim (Section 28(1)), as explained in the question on how and by when to lodge a claim in bankruptcy.

An insolvency petition in Czechia

The Czech Insolvency Act (Act No. 182/2006 Sb.) treats a debtor as insolvent if they have multiple creditors, monetary debts more than 30 days overdue and are unable to pay those debts (Section 3(1)). A debtor who is a legal entity or carries on business is also insolvent if they are over-indebted (Section 3(4)).

The creditor must substantiate a due claim and attach a proof of claim to the petition. If the debtor is a legal entity and the creditor keeps accounts or tax records, the creditor must substantiate the claim with one of the documents specified by law, for example an acknowledgment by the debtor bearing a certified signature, an enforceable decision, or confirmation from an auditor, court expert or tax adviser that the creditor records the claim in their accounts (Section 105(1) of Act No. 182/2006 Sb.). The court dismisses the petition if it has not been established that both the petitioner and at least one other person hold due claims. A person to whom the petitioner transferred the claim or part of it in the last 6 months before filing the petition or after the proceedings commenced does not qualify as that other person (Section 143(2)).

A petition against a legal entity carrying on business must be accompanied by a deposit towards the costs of the proceedings of 50 000 Kč; for a petition against an individual or a legal entity that does not carry on business, the deposit is 10 000 Kč (Section 108(1)).

The court rejects a manifestly unfounded petition, for example where the petitioner is clearly seeking to abuse their rights to the debtor’s detriment. It may impose a fine of up to 500 000 Kč, and a new petition against the same debtor may not be filed until 6 months after the rejection becomes final, unless the petition was rejected solely because the deposit was not paid (Section 128a of Act No. 182/2006 Sb.). If the petition was rejected or the proceedings were discontinued through the petitioner’s fault, the petitioner is liable for damage or other harm caused by the commencement of the proceedings, and their fault is presumed in cases of doubt. A claim for compensation may also arise where the petition is dismissed, but not where it was dismissed, for example, because the debtor paid after it was filed or reached an agreement with the creditors. Where the petitioner is a legal entity, members of its statutory governing body generally also bear liability as guarantors for the petitioner’s obligations (Section 147(1) to (3)).

How we can help

We will assess the supporting documents and recommend whether to file a bankruptcy petition or pursue a civil action, a payment order or enforcement. We will propose a course of action through our debt recovery service or, for a Czech debtor, our debt recovery in the Czech Republic service. Send us the invoices, demands for payment and everything you know about the debtor’s other creditors.

This answer provides general information on the law as at 3 October 2026. It does not constitute legal services or replace an assessment of an individual case. The details of your situation may differ. Book a consultation to discuss them.

More legal questions

All questions and answers
  1. What must a payment demand contain to avoid being an unfair practice? The demand should identify the contract, state that the consumer is in default and itemise principal and each additional amount: interest, default interest, late-payment charges, recovery costs and any other claims. It should also include its issue date, payment instructions and contact details for checking the current balance. A demand lacking these details may be assessed as an unfair commercial practice.
  2. Why should a debt acknowledgement be in a separate document? Because a court treated a form combining debt acknowledgement with other transactions, whose hidden purpose was to extend limitation, as an unfair commercial practice and the acknowledgement itself as absolutely invalid for conflict with good morals. An acknowledgement of a time-barred debt also has effect only if the debtor knew it was time-barred. The consumer must therefore receive clear information about limitation and its consequences, preferably in the same document.
  3. The debtor company failed with no assets. Can we sue its managing director directly? Yes, the law gives the creditor a direct claim. Anyone required to file a bankruptcy petition for the company who failed to do so in time is liable for the resulting loss to creditors. The law assists the creditor with a rebuttable presumption: unless otherwise proved, the loss equals the unpaid portion of the claim. The claim is subject to limitation, so do not delay.
  4. The debtor transferred assets to family members to avoid paying. Can anything be done? Yes. The Civil Code gives creditors an avoidance action: the court declares that a transaction prejudicing the creditor is legally ineffective against them. The transfer is not cancelled and the assets do not return to the debtor, but the creditor can enforce directly against the assets transferred as though the transfer had never occurred. For transfers to close persons, the law significantly eases the creditor's evidential burden; the action must be brought within three years of the transaction.

Cannot find your question? Ask your own question

Facing this situation?

Tell us what you need help with.

Describe your situation. We will review it and usually tell you within 24 hours whether and how we can help, including an indicative fee.

  1. 1Send your enquiry via this form
  2. 2Usually within 24 h you get a price confirmation and plan
  3. 3We start work only after your approval
Mgr. Patrik Tulinský, LL.M. Czech and Slovak attorney · SAK 300422 · ČAK 19654

Not keen on calls or email? Message us on WhatsApp →
Prefer to book a time right away? Book a consultation →
Or email us about this matter.

PDF, Word, images, ZIP… max 10 MB per file, 30 MB total.

Submitting this form does not create an engagement or attorney-client relationship. Before taking on a matter we run a conflict-of-interest check, so please do not send sensitive originals until we confirm the matter together.

Contact a lawyer